2010NA TZCA Dar es Salaam
The applicants failed to satisfy any of the grounds for review under Rule 66(1) as their arguments merely repeated grounds of appeal already determined. The application was filed within time, but no manifest error or other review ground was established. The court is functus officio regarding the appeal already determined.
- Citation
- 2010NA TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Applicants: Abrahamani Mapunda and Others; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application for Review / Judgment on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Review of Appellate Judgment, Limitation Period for Review, Identification Evidence, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abrahamani Mapunda and Others
Applicants
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Review / Judgment on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for review was filed within the limitation period
- 2 Whether the grounds for review under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2010 were satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to satisfy any of the grounds for review under Rule 66(1) as their arguments merely repeated grounds of appeal already determined. The application was filed within time, but no manifest error or other review ground was established. The court is functus officio regarding the appeal already determined.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for review is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment