article 19 v state of eritrea communication 275 of 2003 2007 achpr 79 30 may 2007
The Commission found that the incommunicado detention of journalists without charge or trial for over five years, the ban on the private press, and the denial of access to legal representation and families constituted violations of Articles 1, 5, 6, 7(1), 9, and 18 of the African Charter. The State failed to demonstrate that domestic remedies were available, effective, or sufficient, and the exceptions to the exhaustion requirement applied. The Charter does not permit derogation even in times of emergency, and the State's actions could not be justified by domestic law or national security concerns.
- Citation
- article 19 v state of eritrea communication 275 of 2003 2007 achpr 79 30 may 2007
- Parties
- Complainant: Article 19; Respondent: The State of Eritrea
- Court
- ACHPR
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Communication (individual Complaint) / Decision on Merits After Admissibility
- Outcome
- Violation found; recommendations issued
- Legal Topics
- Arbitrary Detention, Freedom of Expression, Right to Fair Trial, Judicial Independence, Incommunicado Detention, Freedom of the Press, Compensation for Human Rights Violations
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Article 19
Complainant
The State of Eritrea
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Communication (individual Complaint) / Decision on Merits After Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the incommunicado detention of journalists without trial violates the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
- 2 Whether the ban on the private press violates the right to freedom of expression under the Charter
- 3 Whether the failure to bring detainees to trial within a reasonable time constitutes a violation of fair trial rights
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission found that the incommunicado detention of journalists without charge or trial for over five years, the ban on the private press, and the denial of access to legal representation and families constituted violations of Articles 1, 5, 6, 7(1), 9, and 18 of the African Charter. The State failed to demonstrate that domestic remedies were available, effective, or sufficient, and the exceptions to the exhaustion requirement applied. The Charter does not permit derogation even in times of emergency, and the State's actions could not be justified by domestic law or national security concerns.
Court Disposition
Violation found; recommendations issued
Orders
- The government of Eritrea is urged to release or bring to a speedy and fair trial the 18 journalists detained since September 2001.
- The government is urged to lift the ban on the press.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment