20130731 TZHC Arusha

20130731 TZHC Arusha

The applicant's delay was not due to dilatory conduct or negligence but due to reliance on legal aid, which was unavailable during the holiday. The applicant has shown sufficient reason for the delay and is entitled to extension of time under Rule 56 of the Labour Court Rules.

Citation
20130731 TZHC Arusha
Parties
Applicant: Thomas Daniel; Respondent: Simba Safaris Ltd
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
31 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision of Arbitration Award, Sufficient Cause for Delay
Source Language
English
Labour Law Extension of Time Revision of Arbitration Award Sufficient Cause for Delay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Daniel

Applicant

Simba Safaris Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for revision

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's delay was not due to dilatory conduct or negligence but due to reliance on legal aid, which was unavailable during the holiday. The applicant has shown sufficient reason for the delay and is entitled to extension of time under Rule 56 of the Labour Court Rules.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant to file the intended application within fourteen days from the order if he wishes to do so.