thomas gilbert obilla vs perpetua boniface chilai and 2 others 2020 tzhclandd 2281 28 september 2020

thomas gilbert obilla vs perpetua boniface chilai and 2 others 2020 tzhclandd 2281 28 september 2020

The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay by showing prompt efforts to obtain necessary documents and by filing the application within a reasonable time after the previous application was struck out. Therefore, extension of time was warranted.

Citation
thomas gilbert obilla vs perpetua boniface chilai and 2 others 2020 tzhclandd 2281 28 september 2020
Parties
Applicant: Thomas Gilbert Obilla; 1st Respondent: Perpetua Bonifas Chilai; 2nd Respondent: Robert Joseph Chiti; 3rd Respondent: Prisca Isaya Kilwai
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
28 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Delay in Obtaining Judgment and Decree
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Gilbert Obilla

Applicant

Perpetua Bonifas Chilai

1st Respondent

Robert Joseph Chiti

2nd Respondent

Prisca Isaya Kilwai

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause has been shown to warrant extension of time to appeal against the judgment and decree of the District Land and Housing Tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay by showing prompt efforts to obtain necessary documents and by filing the application within a reasonable time after the previous application was struck out. Therefore, extension of time was warranted.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Time is extended for the applicant to lodge the intended appeal within 21 days of the date of this ruling.
  • Costs shall follow cause.