tulizo kahulo vs republic 2016 tzhc 2068 12 october 2016

tulizo kahulo vs republic 2016 tzhc 2068 12 october 2016

The applicant demonstrated that the delay was not due to his own dilatory conduct but was attributable to reliance on prison authorities, and the respondent accepted these reasons; therefore, extension of time is granted to avoid injustice.

Citation
tulizo kahulo vs republic 2016 tzhc 2068 12 october 2016
Parties
Applicant: Tulizo Kahulo; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
12 October 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Right to Appeal, Delay in Filing Appeal
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tulizo Kahulo

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 whether sufficient reasons exist to grant extension of time to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated that the delay was not due to his own dilatory conduct but was attributable to reliance on prison authorities, and the respondent accepted these reasons; therefore, extension of time is granted to avoid injustice.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • extension of time granted to file appeal
  • applicant to file appeal within twenty (20) days from date of ruling