tulizo so kahulo vs republic 2019 tzca 342 30 september 2019

tulizo so kahulo vs republic 2019 tzca 342 30 september 2019

The prosecution proved the charge of rape beyond reasonable doubt based on the credible testimony of the victim, reliable identification, and supporting circumstantial evidence; delay in medical examination and absence of medical evidence did not undermine proof.

Citation
tulizo so kahulo vs republic 2019 tzca 342 30 september 2019
Parties
Appellant: Tulizo s/o Kahulo; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
30 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Evidence, Identification, Medical Evidence, Standard of Proof
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Rape Evidence Identification Medical Evidence Standard of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tulizo s/o Kahulo

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved the charge of rape beyond reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether the identification of the accused was reliable
  3. 3 Whether delay in medical examination affected evidential value

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution proved the charge of rape beyond reasonable doubt based on the credible testimony of the victim, reliable identification, and supporting circumstantial evidence; delay in medical examination and absence of medical evidence did not undermine proof.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction and sentence of 30 years imprisonment upheld