tunduru district council and another vs abdallah saleh tuwel 2023 tzhc 21055 19 september 2023
- Citation
- tunduru district council and another vs abdallah saleh tuwel 2023 tzhc 21055 19 september 2023
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 19 September 2023
- Posture
- Civil / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 19 September 2023
- Posture
- Civil / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The deed of settlement lawfully resolved all disputes between the parties, and its terms were adopted as the judgment and decree of the court.
Court disposition
case settled by consent judgment
Orders
- Defendant to pay plaintiff TZS 11,000,000 in lieu of TZS 26,364,370.35 claimed.
- Defendant has already paid TZS 4,000,000; remaining TZS 7,000,000 to be paid in ten instalments of TZS 700,000 each.
- Each instalment to be paid on or before 23rd of each month starting 23rd September, 2023.
- Parties to maintain mutual relationship.
- No further claims between parties except for performance of settlement terms.
- Deed of settlement recorded as decree of the court.
- Each party to bear its own costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
Tunduru District Council
Plaintiff Counsel: Emmanuel BakariThe Attorney General
Plaintiff Counsel: Emmanuel BakariAbdallah Saleh Tuwel
Defendant Counsel: Hilary NdumbaroAmounts and remedies
- Settlement Amount: TZS 11,000,000
- Amount Already Paid: TZS 4,000,000
- Remaining Balance: TZS 7,000,000
- Instalment Amount: TZS 700,000
- Original Claim: TZS 26,364,370.35
- Counterclaim Amount: TZS 19,833,475
- General Damages Claimed: TZS 200,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Consent Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
unpaid service levy
- 02
breach of agreement
- 03
counterclaim for supplied diesel
- 04
lawfulness of deed of settlement
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Plaintiffs claimed payment of TZS 26,364,370.35 for unpaid service levy from 2017 to 2020, 7% interest, general damages of TZS 200,000,000, costs, and other reliefs.
- Respondent
- Defendant denied claims and counterclaimed for TZS 19,833,475 for diesel supplied, alleging breach of agreement and seeking set-off.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order XXIII, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33, R.E. 2019
Court must satisfy itself that a deed of settlement is lawful and compromises the suit in whole or in part.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The deed of settlement lawfully resolved all disputes between the parties, and its terms were adopted as the judgment and decree of the court.
Obiter and limits
- Parties agreed to live in peace and maintain their mutual relationship.
- No party shall bring any claim previous, present or future against the other party concerning this suit, save performance of the deed of settlement.
Court disposition
case settled by consent judgment
- Defendant to pay plaintiff TZS 11,000,000 in lieu of TZS 26,364,370.35 claimed.
- Defendant has already paid TZS 4,000,000; remaining TZS 7,000,000 to be paid in ten instalments of TZS 700,000 each.
- Each instalment to be paid on or before 23rd of each month starting 23rd September, 2023.
- Parties to maintain mutual relationship.
- No further claims between parties except for performance of settlement terms.
- Deed of settlement recorded as decree of the court.
- Each party to bear its own costs.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 19 September 2023
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 19 September 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA IN THE SUB - REGISTRY OF SONGEA
AT SONGEA CIVIL CASE NO. 11 OF 2022 TUNDURU DISTRICT COUNCIL …………………..………..……… 1ST PLAINTIFF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ….………………………………..……... 2ND PLAINTIFF
VERSUS ABDALLAH SALEH TUWEL ……………………………..…………....... DEFENDANT
CONSENT JUDGMENT 19th and 19th September, 2023 KISANYA, J.: The above named plaintiffs instituted a summary suit against the defendant, Abdallah Saleh Tuwel, for unpaid service levy from 2017 to 2020. They prayed for the judgment and decree as follows: 1. Payment in full of TZS. 26,364,370.35 by the Defendant to the 1st Plaintiff being actual loss service levy from 2017 to 2020.
2. The payment of 7% of the total due from the date of filing this suit to the date of judgment to be borne by the Defendant.
3. General damages to the tune of TZS 200,000,000/= as this Honourable Court may deem fit to grant.
4. The cost of the suit to be borne by the Defendant 1 5. Any other reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit to grant. The defendant was granted leave to enter appearance and filed his defence against the summary suit. In his written statement of defence, the defendant denied the plaintiffs’ claims. He also raised a counterclaim for amount of money arising from diesel which he supplied to the 1st plaintiff (1st defendant to counterclaim) from 2020 to 2022. In his counterclaim, the defendant (plaintiff to the counterclaim), prayed for the following reliefs: 1. An order that the Defendants (plaintiffs to the main case) are in breach of the Agreement.
2. An order that the defendants should pay the Plaintiff (defendant to the main case) the sum of Tanzanian Shillings 19,833,475 or set off the claim of service levy. However, on the 1st day of September, 2023, parties filed a deed of settlement which was executed on 23rd August, 2023. When this matter was called on for orders today, Mr. Emmanuel Bakari, learned State Attorney appeared for the plaintiffs. He was also holding brief of Mr. Hilary Ndumbaro, learned advocate for defendant with instruction to proceed. 2 At the outset, Mr. Bakari informed the court that parties had settled the matter out of court and filed a deed of settlement to such effect. He then asked this Court to record and register the deed of settlement as forming the judgment and decree of the Court in accordance with the law. He also prayed that this matter be marked settled on the terms and conditions of the deed of settlement. The foregoing prayer is governed by Order XXIII, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33, R.E.
2019. In terms of that provision, the duty of Court is to satisfy itself on whether the deed of settlement is lawful and compromises the suit in whole or in part. Having glanced at the deed of settlement, I am satisfied that it is a lawful agreement which settles the dispute between the parties herein. In that regard, the said deed of settlement is recorded and adopted to form part of the consent judgment on the terms and conditions agreed thereto as rephrased hereunder: 1. That, the defendant shall pay the plaintiff a sum of TZS 11,000,000/= (settlement amount) in lieu of TZS 26,364,370.35 claimed in the main case. 3 2. That, as the defendant has already paid TZS 4,000,000/= of the settlement amount, the remaining balance of TZS 7,000,000 shall be paid in ten (10) instalments of TZS 700,000/= each.
3. That, the amount of each instalment under paragraph 2 above shall be paid on or before 23rd of each month effective from 23rd September, 2023.
4. That, parties agreed to live in peace and maintain their mutual relationship as it was before the commencement of the suit.
5. Upon execution of the deed of settlement, no party shall bring any claim previous, present or future against the other party concerning this suit, save the performance of terms and conditions of the deed of settlement 6. That, this deed of settlement is recorded as the decree of the Court.
7. That, each party shall bear its own costs. In view thereof, I hereby hold that parties have resolved their dispute and mark this case settled on the compromise of the parties as per above terms of the Deed of Settlement. 4 It is so ordered. DATED at SONGEA this 19th day of September, 2023 S.E. KISANYA
JUDGE Court: Consent judgment delivered this 19th day of September, 2023 in the presence of Mr. Emmanuel Bakari, learned State Attorney for the plaintiffs and also holding brief of Mr. Hilary Ndumbaro, learned advocate for the defendant. S.E. KISANYA
JUDGE 19/09/2023 5
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.