Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

tunduru district council and another vs abdallah saleh tuwel 2023 tzhc 21055 19 september 2023

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The deed of settlement lawfully resolved all disputes between the parties, and its terms were adopted as the judgment and decree of the court.

Court disposition

case settled by consent judgment

Orders

  • Defendant to pay plaintiff TZS 11,000,000 in lieu of TZS 26,364,370.35 claimed.
  • Defendant has already paid TZS 4,000,000; remaining TZS 7,000,000 to be paid in ten instalments of TZS 700,000 each.
  • Each instalment to be paid on or before 23rd of each month starting 23rd September, 2023.
  • Parties to maintain mutual relationship.
  • No further claims between parties except for performance of settlement terms.
  • Deed of settlement recorded as decree of the court.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Tunduru District Council

Plaintiff Counsel: Emmanuel Bakari

The Attorney General

Plaintiff Counsel: Emmanuel Bakari

Abdallah Saleh Tuwel

Defendant Counsel: Hilary Ndumbaro

Amounts and remedies

  • Settlement Amount: TZS 11,000,000
  • Amount Already Paid: TZS 4,000,000
  • Remaining Balance: TZS 7,000,000
  • Instalment Amount: TZS 700,000
  • Original Claim: TZS 26,364,370.35
  • Counterclaim Amount: TZS 19,833,475
  • General Damages Claimed: TZS 200,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Consent Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiffs claimed payment of TZS 26,364,370.35 for unpaid service levy from 2017 to 2020, 7% interest, general damages of TZS 200,000,000, costs, and other reliefs.
Respondent
Defendant denied claims and counterclaimed for TZS 19,833,475 for diesel supplied, alleging breach of agreement and seeking set-off.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXIII, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33, R.E. 2019

    Court must satisfy itself that a deed of settlement is lawful and compromises the suit in whole or in part.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The deed of settlement lawfully resolved all disputes between the parties, and its terms were adopted as the judgment and decree of the court.

Obiter and limits

  • Parties agreed to live in peace and maintain their mutual relationship.
  • No party shall bring any claim previous, present or future against the other party concerning this suit, save performance of the deed of settlement.

Court disposition

case settled by consent judgment

  • Defendant to pay plaintiff TZS 11,000,000 in lieu of TZS 26,364,370.35 claimed.
  • Defendant has already paid TZS 4,000,000; remaining TZS 7,000,000 to be paid in ten instalments of TZS 700,000 each.
  • Each instalment to be paid on or before 23rd of each month starting 23rd September, 2023.
  • Parties to maintain mutual relationship.
  • No further claims between parties except for performance of settlement terms.
  • Deed of settlement recorded as decree of the court.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 19 September 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 19 September 2023

tunduru district council and another vs abdallah saleh tuwel 2023 tzhc 21055 19 september 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA IN THE SUB - REGISTRY OF SONGEA

AT SONGEA CIVIL CASE NO. 11 OF 2022 TUNDURU DISTRICT COUNCIL …………………..………..……… 1ST PLAINTIFF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ….………………………………..……... 2ND PLAINTIFF

VERSUS ABDALLAH SALEH TUWEL ……………………………..…………....... DEFENDANT

CONSENT JUDGMENT 19th and 19th September, 2023 KISANYA, J.: The above named plaintiffs instituted a summary suit against the defendant, Abdallah Saleh Tuwel, for unpaid service levy from 2017 to 2020. They prayed for the judgment and decree as follows: 1. Payment in full of TZS. 26,364,370.35 by the Defendant to the 1st Plaintiff being actual loss service levy from 2017 to 2020.

2. The payment of 7% of the total due from the date of filing this suit to the date of judgment to be borne by the Defendant.

3. General damages to the tune of TZS 200,000,000/= as this Honourable Court may deem fit to grant.

4. The cost of the suit to be borne by the Defendant 1 5. Any other reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit to grant. The defendant was granted leave to enter appearance and filed his defence against the summary suit. In his written statement of defence, the defendant denied the plaintiffs’ claims. He also raised a counterclaim for amount of money arising from diesel which he supplied to the 1st plaintiff (1st defendant to counterclaim) from 2020 to 2022. In his counterclaim, the defendant (plaintiff to the counterclaim), prayed for the following reliefs: 1. An order that the Defendants (plaintiffs to the main case) are in breach of the Agreement.

2. An order that the defendants should pay the Plaintiff (defendant to the main case) the sum of Tanzanian Shillings 19,833,475 or set off the claim of service levy. However, on the 1st day of September, 2023, parties filed a deed of settlement which was executed on 23rd August, 2023. When this matter was called on for orders today, Mr. Emmanuel Bakari, learned State Attorney appeared for the plaintiffs. He was also holding brief of Mr. Hilary Ndumbaro, learned advocate for defendant with instruction to proceed. 2 At the outset, Mr. Bakari informed the court that parties had settled the matter out of court and filed a deed of settlement to such effect. He then asked this Court to record and register the deed of settlement as forming the judgment and decree of the Court in accordance with the law. He also prayed that this matter be marked settled on the terms and conditions of the deed of settlement. The foregoing prayer is governed by Order XXIII, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33, R.E.

2019. In terms of that provision, the duty of Court is to satisfy itself on whether the deed of settlement is lawful and compromises the suit in whole or in part. Having glanced at the deed of settlement, I am satisfied that it is a lawful agreement which settles the dispute between the parties herein. In that regard, the said deed of settlement is recorded and adopted to form part of the consent judgment on the terms and conditions agreed thereto as rephrased hereunder: 1. That, the defendant shall pay the plaintiff a sum of TZS 11,000,000/= (settlement amount) in lieu of TZS 26,364,370.35 claimed in the main case. 3 2. That, as the defendant has already paid TZS 4,000,000/= of the settlement amount, the remaining balance of TZS 7,000,000 shall be paid in ten (10) instalments of TZS 700,000/= each.

3. That, the amount of each instalment under paragraph 2 above shall be paid on or before 23rd of each month effective from 23rd September, 2023.

4. That, parties agreed to live in peace and maintain their mutual relationship as it was before the commencement of the suit.

5. Upon execution of the deed of settlement, no party shall bring any claim previous, present or future against the other party concerning this suit, save the performance of terms and conditions of the deed of settlement 6. That, this deed of settlement is recorded as the decree of the Court.

7. That, each party shall bear its own costs. In view thereof, I hereby hold that parties have resolved their dispute and mark this case settled on the compromise of the parties as per above terms of the Deed of Settlement. 4 It is so ordered. DATED at SONGEA this 19th day of September, 2023 S.E. KISANYA

JUDGE Court: Consent judgment delivered this 19th day of September, 2023 in the presence of Mr. Emmanuel Bakari, learned State Attorney for the plaintiffs and also holding brief of Mr. Hilary Ndumbaro, learned advocate for the defendant. S.E. KISANYA

JUDGE 19/09/2023 5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order XXIII, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33, R.E. 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.