Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19711015 TZHC Arusha2

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.

The case details and available source text remain public. Open Judgment to read the record.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 15 October 1971

19711015 TZHC Arusha2

-TL s va 77 Aofvro * - .q - •. *4# * •.*v iM *ø at* 6 Ut LL&LL •* j44 iL k4 Q* r7 OWN, Lwstt 1a t4 t t* t&p Aa 4j fttk U)ø (* 4tt * * i tit o4 1i -kr 4 *A4 ,100,V &! 4 owl #t, 4i Mj4 f1g 1 Atht '~ Ae t-*t i*A* r -- - • - i Mkvsn't HL% : ibr- t4 M 1J 10 * *irni * - M$ -r* t. ü# *t 14sr *t 1444,9 4q si*4 2I. 4 4. btM • ft* -*ci * Z- 4vhq, -4 437 4: 1t 1s 1t %i t b2 - if -.--'-,. z_i_ • I - . woc 4 qv j U. *t Mht. ) W48 •$ ns . Z *t$$ t t& t th Lj \ t *4t tLU*4 t Mi i *t MUt \- \_---::-c *' •4W V 1 t i4 tho % 40 , Ultiao Orj4 t At. fl t 4 'd •t1 :V44 jai to jawt l'fy )6iat r*ok tc 4 Of ** t tt% uka V4 t.41,144 4044 4 t4 Vt *? fl8 V t4A end- ai tc $Y i4 Y h 7) #G 17V Wit *t ) ttt 4V ( ) j V M7 44ttt! $ % V it ' 04% *4 *j ) Uie • 4 14rt ''f 4' •* V y $ aud V* t4 04t ts tU4 .* of , *% g4 at ow H L *i hr $ 1Y v*) #%krz *1*4 4 li siloct 4 td crt *p1 tt * 4 i iii 4*t4 th ** if tw X*4i$, Ifto •Z*$ * Olt cavt ** t* ItUk f 44 84 tft MU VI1 U i* rn øtt. *tt* * • *4• $' * * 33, f iJØT J8# M ' 03 v 01 tb tn ) Of ** rn * rnfts 4 brt ," t %b AI *i 43t4 Wt&4 P øiVft 0*449aunwip 4AIt kv b.a # at 4% &M*. EVr1 *•t* *T Cq) ** i *I4 M5 1 VULl s $ *w i.* * Oa* eb i 4t , • 1*i* M u hoolw t1r * hn $)a ths.t MtiL () to foo, 0 z *M* is bi1h X t r t*ff4t 1* *f .* 44 * iM tii to * # *p*ba *i*t t. afls 14* 4t *Un cau jw4A ttI *e *M b Ran W* PIK 1$ t1 4 i, k4 frLi e. 44a* ta or 4 . atw, wAloh: al-Aqu ii fv k4t ** rtflf 3QL 1ky rn. *4, t, i$th o .t b tr ra t* m 1 fiva 61 - 1414 t akL*t lavIrlf its *1* 14 $44 4400low U0. tAu • \__-.. 23J , Va es SPILPIT-

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.