uap insurance t ltd vs yuda shayo 6 others 2022 tzhcld 231 20 may 2022
A revision application filed by a party aggrieved by an order striking out an execution application not filed by itself is incompetent and must be struck out, as only the party whose application was struck out may refile or seek further remedies.
- Citation
- uap insurance t ltd vs yuda shayo 6 others 2022 tzhcld 231 20 may 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: UAP Insurance (T) Limited; Respondents: Yuda Shayo & 6 Others
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Revision Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Awards, Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement, Striking Out Applications, Revision Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UAP Insurance (T) Limited
Applicant
Yuda Shayo & 6 Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Revision Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant can be aggrieved by an order striking out an execution application filed by the respondents
- 2 Whether the revision application against an order striking out execution application is competent
- 3 Interpretation of section 40(3) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act regarding compensation in lieu of reinstatement
Ratio Decidendi
A revision application filed by a party aggrieved by an order striking out an execution application not filed by itself is incompetent and must be struck out, as only the party whose application was struck out may refile or seek further remedies.
Court Disposition
application struck out as incompetent
Orders
- Application struck out for being incompetent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment