uap insurance t ltd vs yuda shayo and 6 others 2020 tzhcld 3815 18 december 2020

uap insurance t ltd vs yuda shayo and 6 others 2020 tzhcld 3815 18 december 2020

The application is incompetent for being initiated by a defective notice of application and chamber summons, violating mandatory procedural requirements under Rule 24(2) of the Labour Court Rules.

Citation
uap insurance t ltd vs yuda shayo and 6 others 2020 tzhcld 3815 18 december 2020
Parties
Applicant: UAP Insurance (T) Ltd; Respondents: Yuda Shayo & 6 Others
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Outcome
Application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Defective Notice of Application, Defective Chamber Summons, Defective Affidavit, Jurisdiction, Procedural Compliance
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

UAP Insurance (T) Ltd

Applicant

Yuda Shayo & 6 Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objections

  1. 1 Whether the notice of application and chamber summons are fatally defective for containing grounds of material facts and legal issues
  2. 2 Whether the affidavit in support of the application is defective for verification and falsity
  3. 3 Whether the application is incompetent for procedural defects

Ratio Decidendi

The application is incompetent for being initiated by a defective notice of application and chamber summons, violating mandatory procedural requirements under Rule 24(2) of the Labour Court Rules.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Application struck out from Court's registry
  • Applicant granted leave to file proper application on or before 11/01/2021