UKPB 2013 GROUP VS GIDEON JULIUS SINKONDE MISC

UKPB 2013 GROUP VS GIDEON JULIUS SINKONDE MISC

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence in the affidavit to substantiate the alleged follow-ups for obtaining judgment and proceedings, did not attach the alleged letters, and failed to account for the period of delay from 13th February 2024 to 14th June 2024. Therefore, sufficient cause for extension of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
UKPB 2013 GROUP VS GIDEON JULIUS SINKONDE MISC
Parties
Applicant: UKBP2013 Group; Respondent: Gideon Julius Sinkonde
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Bill of Costs
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Bill of Costs, Affidavit Evidence, Court Discretion
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Bill of Costs Affidavit Evidence Court Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

UKBP2013 Group

Applicant

Gideon Julius Sinkonde

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to file a bill of costs

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence in the affidavit to substantiate the alleged follow-ups for obtaining judgment and proceedings, did not attach the alleged letters, and failed to account for the period of delay from 13th February 2024 to 14th June 2024. Therefore, sufficient cause for extension of time was not demonstrated.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs
  • Right of appeal explained