ultimate security t ltd vs joseph goliama 2 others 2022 tzhcld 605 17 june 2022
The Mediator's order striking out the dispute was interlocutory as it did not finally determine the rights of the parties, and therefore, the application for revision is not maintainable under Rule 50 of the Labour Court Rules.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- ultimate security t ltd vs joseph goliama 2 others 2022 tzhcld 605 17 june 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Ultimate Security (T) Ltd; Respondent: Joseph Goliama; Respondent: Ruth Kaaya; Respondent: David Chambua
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Revision Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Orders, Revision Jurisdiction, Limitation of Actions, Striking Out Proceedings
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ultimate Security (T) Ltd
Applicant
Joseph Goliama
Respondent
Ruth Kaaya
Respondent
David Chambua
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order striking out the dispute was interlocutory and thus not subject to revision
- 2 Whether the Mediator erred in law and fact by striking out the complaint
Ratio Decidendi
The Mediator's order striking out the dispute was interlocutory as it did not finally determine the rights of the parties, and therefore, the application for revision is not maintainable under Rule 50 of the Labour Court Rules.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Preliminary objection upheld
- Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment