20060405 TZCA Dar es Salaam

20060405 TZCA Dar es Salaam

Since Rule 9(2)(b) does not prescribe a limitation period and execution had not commenced, the application was not time barred; serious triable issues exist in the pending appeal, including jurisdiction, justifying a stay of execution.

Citation
20060405 TZCA Dar es Salaam
Parties
Applicant: Universal Electronics & Hardware Limited and two others; Respondent: N.B.C. Limited
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
5 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Merits of Application for Stay
Outcome
Stay of execution granted pending appeal; preliminary objection overruled.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Limitation Periods, Jurisdiction, Security for Debt
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Universal Electronics & Hardware Limited and two others

Applicant

N.B.C. Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Merits of Application for Stay

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution is time barred
  2. 2 Whether stay of execution should be granted pending appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Since Rule 9(2)(b) does not prescribe a limitation period and execution had not commenced, the application was not time barred; serious triable issues exist in the pending appeal, including jurisdiction, justifying a stay of execution.

Court Disposition

Stay of execution granted pending appeal; preliminary objection overruled.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the High Court decree pending determination of Civil Appeal No. 29 of 2005.
  • Costs of the application to abide the result of the appeal.