Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19910905 TZHC Dodoma

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court finds that the applicant is entitled to file for divorce and for distribution of assets as the marriage is irretrievably broken.

Court disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant is permitted to proceed with divorce and distribution of assets

02

Material facts

Parties

Unknown Applicant

Applicant

Unknown Respondent

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Divorce / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to divorce and distribution of assets

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant seeks divorce and distribution of assets, contending the marriage is irretrievably broken.
Respondent
No specific argument from respondent is mentioned.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General principles of family law

    A party is entitled to file an application for divorce and for distribution of assets if the marriage is irretrievably broken.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court finds that the applicant is entitled to file for divorce and for distribution of assets as the marriage is irretrievably broken.

Court disposition

Application allowed

  • Applicant is permitted to proceed with divorce and distribution of assets

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 5 September 1991

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 5 September 1991

19910905 TZHC Dodoma

IlT Tl.LJ ;:;::: c~ cotr:tT Or:' T.,_.'S.' Z./'..;.IT}... ·/ i~l M!~J?IOi:D;.~22[.I~.JJ'.IJl~ im_~_J_Q?_ J).~J.. (F-.c n t~.::.c: 0..-:;oi,.:;L,:1 ci' t>.; Dic:ti,iot Ccm.,t cf DDc'..c-c..-. c~t Do<..~oc.1n i::: !.ic;tri1:,c:.J.2..l A.::>~;d lTc. j of OS:1) Vvrr;ur.; iO uivoroc: .. co:nti~1CO t>.i ~(i\U't' t::.r:,t · t':.v 1:1~·:..,i:-::t;'-' i:1 qu.,.:;tic:1 1-.,: •. :1ot i:I'I<Jl)C,r;.·.bly brclo:1 ,.kt,l'\• t\m:,v:~r l I\;(,l':; t to :1( tc tI.:.r. t Nr. !,t,dci 1o offcrtG wo:t\) V:;~::,.'- = 2 = In the cc,o::J p,t ;_:,.c,;1cl it iu ~1ot n:,;_~tionc.;ci c:.1yt,J.::.:)r-:.., :.-.(:1.;- mttcJ.: brid;)prio:) lw.d boo,.-i ;_)c..ic.l. :::Jxoou ticn of ~~uo:.:. r.~ vc:;guc C..001'0.:, mc.y :r..,i,tll t i:1 rliffictu ti:,n. JJ.-w. I or~y 1,ci:1t out :L:1 1,,:r•,;t,B' t\,~t, tb::_~-1.~·:lf,) ic c:;,t l_i1) ..::rt,y tc f:1.L [,1.2 c.,J:)lio,,tic~l c~:l t.: ...) ,~C,f:2; c1ivorc:) o::-,r.;o fj_L) Lr· t>,c t.i;.:tribut~.c: .. •··· .. ,'. Cc:urt1 J"u).[:;t:1.,~1t C:L-:.:1:i.v-:.::c.;c'.: :;_;,_ c:.::-r.,1J:.'.;;rr.; Lt Dc.dcmr.:. 2:.: t':.:; l'lrcr.;;;:::10;:; c,f ... ~~-rr~~~:=; (}1 ".L. li., AlU,.;,!J.-:.,1. JtrXC, _ •

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.