Urbano Basso v Nicodemus Anthony and Another

Urbano Basso v Nicodemus Anthony and Another

The appeal was dismissed because the evidence of visual identification was unreliable due to unfavourable conditions, lack of detail on the source and intensity of light, contradictions in testimony, and the appellant's improper motive requiring corroboration, which was absent.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
Urbano Basso v Nicodemus Anthony and Another
Parties
Appellant: Urbano Basso; Respondent: Nicodemus Anthony; Respondent: Philipo Anthony
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Visual Identification, Burden of Proof, Right to Be Heard, Corroboration of Evidence
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm Visual Identification Burden of Proof Right to Be Heard Corroboration of Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Urbano Basso

Appellant

Nicodemus Anthony

Respondent

Philipo Anthony

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was denied the right to be heard in the first appellate court
  2. 2 Whether the conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm was supported by sufficient and reliable evidence, particularly regarding visual identification
  3. 3 Whether the appellant's evidence required corroboration due to possible improper motive

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the evidence of visual identification was unreliable due to unfavourable conditions, lack of detail on the source and intensity of light, contradictions in testimony, and the appellant's improper motive requiring corroboration, which was absent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed