usangu logistics t limited vs soedtra sprl limited 2023 tzca 208 28 april 2023

usangu logistics t limited vs soedtra sprl limited 2023 tzca 208 28 april 2023

The applicant failed to account for the entire period of delay, and the medical evidence provided was unauthenticated and insufficient. Therefore, sufficient cause for extension of time was not established.

Citation
usangu logistics t limited vs soedtra sprl limited 2023 tzca 208 28 april 2023
Parties
Applicant: Usangu Logistics (T) Limited; Respondent: Sodetra SPRL Limited
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
28 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Restoration of Appeal, Sufficient Cause, Delay, Affidavit Evidence
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Restoration of Appeal Sufficient Cause Delay Affidavit Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Usangu Logistics (T) Limited

Applicant

Sodetra SPRL Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for restoration of a dismissed appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for the entire period of delay, and the medical evidence provided was unauthenticated and insufficient. Therefore, sufficient cause for extension of time was not established.

Court Disposition

dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs