20150316 TZHC Dar es Salaam 1
The absence of the attesting officer's name in the jurat is not a mandatory statutory requirement under section 8 of the Notaries Public and Commissioners for Oaths Act, and such a defect does not render the affidavit fatally defective; the defect is curable by amendment rather than striking out the application.
- Citation
- 20150316 TZHC Dar es Salaam 1
- Parties
- Applicant: Vasco John; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Affidavit Defect
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection dismissed; leave to amend affidavit granted.
- Legal Topics
- Affidavit Defects, Extension of Time, Jurat Requirements, Notaries Public and Commissioners for Oaths
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vasco John
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Affidavit Defect
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether absence of attesting officer's name in jurat renders affidavit fatally defective
- 2 Whether preliminary objection on affidavit defect should be sustained
Ratio Decidendi
The absence of the attesting officer's name in the jurat is not a mandatory statutory requirement under section 8 of the Notaries Public and Commissioners for Oaths Act, and such a defect does not render the affidavit fatally defective; the defect is curable by amendment rather than striking out the application.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection dismissed; leave to amend affidavit granted.
Orders
- Preliminary objection dismissed
- Leave to amend the affidavit is granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment