19760220 TZHC Mwanza
The second will (codicil) was invalid as it was not signed or thumbprinted by the testator and did not comply with statutory or customary requirements for revocation or alteration of a will. The original will did not specifically bequeath the disputed land to the appellant, and the respondent, as developer and user, retained rights to the land.
- Citation
- 19760220 TZHC Mwanza
- Parties
- Appellant: Vedasto Domisiani; Respondent: Donisiani Kasilima
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From District Court Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Wills, Inheritance, Customary Land Tenure, Revocation of Wills
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vedasto Domisiani
Appellant
Donisiani Kasilima
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From District Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second will (codicil) was valid under statutory and customary law
- 2 Whether the disputed land was validly bequeathed to the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The second will (codicil) was invalid as it was not signed or thumbprinted by the testator and did not comply with statutory or customary requirements for revocation or alteration of a will. The original will did not specifically bequeath the disputed land to the appellant, and the respondent, as developer and user, retained rights to the land.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment of the District Court upheld
- The drain shall continue to be the boundary between the parties' shambas
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment