vedasto lesteh lwiza vs ahmed musa chombo and another 2020 tzhclandd 2286 13 august 2020
The applicant demonstrated that he was actively pursuing his rights in court and promptly acted upon discovering the prior decision; the 13-day delay is not inordinate; sufficient cause for extension of time has been established.
- Citation
- vedasto lesteh lwiza vs ahmed musa chombo and another 2020 tzhclandd 2286 13 august 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Vedasto Lesteh Lwizah; 1st Respondent: Ahmad Mussa Chombo; 2nd Respondent: Hamisi Saidi
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Revision, Limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vedasto Lesteh Lwizah
Applicant
Ahmad Mussa Chombo
1st Respondent
Hamisi Saidi
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has adduced sufficient reasons for extension of time to file an application for revision against the decision in Land Application No. 182 of 2009
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant demonstrated that he was actively pursuing his rights in court and promptly acted upon discovering the prior decision; the 13-day delay is not inordinate; sufficient cause for extension of time has been established.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Extension of time granted for applicant to file intended application for revision within thirty days from the date of the ruling.
- Costs to follow the cause in the intended application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment