venture risk management vs jackson ernest mbwile 2022 tzhcld 657 28 june 2022

The application for extension of time is granted because the applicant has raised a prima facie case of illegality in the CMA award, which is a sufficient ground for extension of time.

Citation: venture risk management vs jackson ernest mbwile 2022 tzhcld 657 28 june 2022
Parties: Applicant: Venture Risk Management; Respondent: Jackson Ernest Mbwile
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 28 June 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application allowed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Revision of Arbitral Award
Source Language: English

Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Illegality as Ground for Extension Revision of Arbitral Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Venture Risk Management

Applicant

Jackson Ernest Mbwile

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether sufficient cause exists to grant extension of time to file revision against CMA award
2 Whether alleged illegality in the CMA award constitutes good cause for extension

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time is granted because the applicant has raised a prima facie case of illegality in the CMA award, which is a sufficient ground for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

Extension of time to file revision application against CMA decision granted
Revision application to be filed within seven working days from the date of this ruling