victor alphonce mageta vs republic 2017 tzhc 2264 17 november 2017
The applicant is entitled to bail as the offences charged are bailable and no reasons have been provided to warrant refusal; bail is granted subject to fulfillment of prescribed conditions.
- Citation
- victor alphonce mageta vs republic 2017 tzhc 2264 17 november 2017
- Parties
- Applicant: Victor Alphonce Mageta; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- Bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Narcotic Drugs, Jurisdiction, Surety Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Victor Alphonce Mageta
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail for offences charged under the Drugs Control and Enforcement Act and Economic and Organized Crimes Control Act
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is entitled to bail as the offences charged are bailable and no reasons have been provided to warrant refusal; bail is granted subject to fulfillment of prescribed conditions.
Court Disposition
Bail granted
Orders
- Applicant to execute bail bond of Tshs. 10,000,000
- Applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each to execute bond of Tshs. 10,000,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment