victoria v kombe others vs the attorney general another 2010 tzhc 167 8 october 2010

victoria v kombe others vs the attorney general another 2010 tzhc 167 8 october 2010

Applicants provided sufficient reasons for delay due to their earlier application being struck out for procedural defects, and demonstrated sufficient interest and a prima facie arguable case regarding their discontinuation from university, justifying extension of time and grant of leave for judicial review.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
victoria v kombe others vs the attorney general another 2010 tzhc 167 8 october 2010
Parties
Applicant: Victoria V. Kombe; Applicant: Conrad V. Kombe; Applicant: Nathanael F. Mwande; Applicant: Julius B. Ngaruka; Respondent: The Attorney General; Respondent: The Mzumbe University
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
8 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Leave for Judicial Review
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave for Judicial Review, University Student Discontinuation, Prerogative Orders (certiorari and Mandamus)
Source Language
english
Administrative Law Education Law Extension of Time Leave for Judicial Review University Student Discontinuation Prerogative Orders (certiorari and Mandamus)

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Victoria V. Kombe

Applicant

Conrad V. Kombe

Applicant

Nathanael F. Mwande

Applicant

Julius B. Ngaruka

Applicant

The Attorney General

Respondent

The Mzumbe University

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Leave for Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether sufficient reasons exist to extend time for applying for leave for judicial review
  2. 2 Whether applicants have an arguable case and sufficient interest to justify leave for judicial review

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants provided sufficient reasons for delay due to their earlier application being struck out for procedural defects, and demonstrated sufficient interest and a prima facie arguable case regarding their discontinuation from university, justifying extension of time and grant of leave for judicial review.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Extension of time to file for leave for judicial review granted
  • Leave to apply for judicial review granted