19890914 TZCA Dar es Salaam
The Economic Crimes Court had no jurisdiction to try the appellant for unlawful possession of government trophy at the material time, as the offence was not then a scheduled offence under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, 1984.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19890914 TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Vijufu Mohammd Hilali; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Unlawful Possession of Government Trophy, Scheduled Offences, Retrospective Application of Law
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vijufu Mohammd Hilali
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Economic Crimes Court had jurisdiction to try the offence of unlawful possession of government trophy at the material time
Ratio Decidendi
The Economic Crimes Court had no jurisdiction to try the appellant for unlawful possession of government trophy at the material time, as the offence was not then a scheduled offence under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, 1984.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- proceedings quashed
- sentence set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 'OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CRIMlN~.APrJAL wo, i,; a, 1iQI • ~ tr WI I N ' V~iUF MOHAMmD HtLALX. , • • • APPELLANT AND . ,. .... '-·,_.,,;._ '~ THE REPUBLIC. • RESPONDENT (J,ppeal from the conviction ~nd sentence Of the High CoUrt of ·i Tanzania at Songea ··---- .. Rubama, J.) ·. dated the 13tjl day of' July, 1988 in Econ<.:omic Crimes C,:1se -No. 3 of 1987 JUDGMENT OF THE ·CoURT "'' N01HMIJ0 Htli(.ti:t \I.~~ Qh,sttj!J~ 1,dt1tto wot, dqhti, 01si,,, plH0fUI with Sein~} "'i; i( ,• • .,·~ ._,f · in ·.,inlawful possf.ssicn of iovernm~nt trophy, cont.racy to sections.' .,.: \ .· . . ~ ' . . ,· ......__,.·~~; .... •: > ~-! ' 67·(1), (~) (b) ·e.nd 78(1) of the Wildlife Conservation Act, .1974, rea~·::,.,~,i • ,. .• - :I • tog.ather with Pera 16 of the First •Schedule to the Economic and ' ,'( i Org'3nized 'Crime Ccntrol ~t, 1984 •. At the end of l\:he.'day, however;-- ·: ~ \ ----- -· ', ,.i . ! oniyfne present respondent was found Guilty. He was duly convicted.·--~~•; and s3ntenced tc imprisonme~t for fifteen years. In his appeal to . }~ ' this Court he eppeared in person while Mr. Mw~nyikzt', Principal •• .· ,-~··1 .· ,.:. ,', 1 . ., { St<ite Attorney, ~epresentet-the re::rndent Republic~ . · 11 Tha ~e~ring cf this ap~eal wa,~qlfA_~e..brief •. Relying on this ....,.,.'Iii'\ ' • ., I! <~ court'-s decisiCn in OMARI MOHAMED SHOSHI·-V:. R. (cdm~nal .Appeal _/_f ·.' • No. 130 of 198.6) Mr. Mwanyl.ka subm1ttJ'4t,· the Ee. . .:t.r-• COUf~-:\.;1 Ju•IP, :;,~,?:- .... ; I~ ,f ; .• ,, •• , 1 ~ •,......J ·--•_:..~ .,_ 2 had~v-jurisdictic:n tc., try tl:iecase and so h~ asked us ~to 'quash the .• proceedings. The respondent, a layman, had no reply to this.· Mr. Mwanyika correctly stated what the law was at the material . . tima. We fully explained the ~egal· position in a number of a~peals; '' . I am.Jng them ~. SHC.SHI relied ·on by the learned Principal State Attorn~y; and . . . I - D.P .e • Y• BERN/IRD NJi1VIKE (Criminal Appeal No. 32 Of 1987) • . In brief it· is thnt, Being in Unla".'ful Possession of Governinent trophy per se .- W51 ' not . nt tho m"~•rial ~ima •n ,ao~nmlo "''·"~·· W• , . •~1~v 1eu out'o~r· . .. . ' YL.iw1 t:hO~ci.i.n ,tul h would b11 puint1111 ua l'eJ:Jlfltl ,11,111 h111. We only wish t•.) point cut that .the position has since changed as a result of . . the anac:tment cf the Written Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, ·1989t.. Bein~. _found in unlawful possession of trophy is now a sched~led off enc~··· 1.- .' · ,, ~ ' . under the Econc~ic and Organized Crime Act, 1984. For the purposes of I .., this--'appeel we c>re·of-coUrse "dealing with the position:-as-it-.was. then, ... not as it is now. At the particular time in question the Economic Crimes Court hc:d n<.. jurisdiction to ·try the case. Wo accordingly allow thi~ appeal by quashing the proceedings and setting· cside the sentence imposed. ~e order that ·the appellant I ae charged afresh in a court of -..ompet~nt jurisdiction. We note, . ' ' l 0 incidentally, that the ~ppellant is otherwise lawfully incarcerated on f acc:Junt of acme (.,ther matter. ' - • i 0M mc t\t 01in ts s,1til\~H 11hh 10h rhv u1 #nph111~••1 1 UJi, L. M. MAKAME JUSTICE' OF 1.PPEAL R •. H. 'KISANG1 .I . . JUiTICE OF APPEAL A. M. A. OMAR JUSTICE OF APPEAL· 'I 'I. r ,, ,. -----.----,~--~-~~-----... , I ·• ~- ,..~ ---,..-.~-~- : ·. --"' •,·. . <. :;-_.......... • f •~ I. ', •-,{~ .. -1.~;1 ,r -~ ' ~.--..:..___~.. . :. 1 ,:':' -~: . ·•·- .3 .. I certify that this is a true a'?PY of the original-.-· • .. ~· - • t \ 1·· 4 ,. • .......... ~ . . . . .- - . .. .. ·. ···----•~f"., ..~: -'.;.~ ... ~/ ..~~· :.., ~- .., ... , ';:·-r"' ~ ~J ,· .. . j •. ;,. ) ..!' "· r-: ,. (. J. ~ SENIOR DEPUTY REGISTRAR. -•\·f . . .... ~ • . j ... 'I., ,.1' ~' ·•-·, " .,_ I ·' , •·' . , ' ' ·, .. •' •· -~----· .......... _ , ,. ........... _ ·"¥~ .. ··-·---- ,I• • ...1. .. •· •·· l •1 ,• ' \· ., 1.1_1 .J !i •$ I 1.- ,; ,. ·.I f.•. r I · :t·.i ,, ·\ ·. rrt" -•;, . J' ~~ . ~. • " 1. . ,.... ,. l ' ' ',.j t • ' t I ... ,t •• .. •_, r . ---.-- ·---- ..