vodacom tanzania public limited company vs 247 communication limited 2021 tzhccomd 3394 5 november 2021
- Citation
- vodacom tanzania public limited company vs 247 communication limited 2021 tzhccomd 3394 5 november 2021
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 5 November 2021
- Posture
- Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 5 November 2021
- Posture
- Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court is satisfied that the Deed of Settlement is lawful and settles the whole suit; therefore, it is registered and forms the judgment and decree of the court.
Court disposition
Suit marked settled by consent judgment based on the Deed of Settlement.
Orders
- Deed of Settlement registered and forms part of the consent judgment and decree
- Suit marked settled as per terms of the Deed of Settlement
02
Material facts
Parties
Vodacom Tanzania Public Limited Company
Plaintiff Counsel: Natasha Mukangara and Pascal Mwanyika247 Communication Limited
Defendant Counsel: Noel SangaAmounts and remedies
- Outstanding Amount of Taxes Paid by Plaintiff: TZS 95,275,596.88
03
Procedural history
Posture
Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the Deed of Settlement lawfully settles the dispute between the parties
- 02
Whether the court should record the Deed of Settlement as a consent judgment
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Plaintiff sought payment of TZS 95,275,596.88 for outstanding taxes paid on behalf of the Defendant, commercial interest, court interest, costs, and other reliefs. The Plaintiff informed the court that a settlement had been reached and a Deed of Settlement filed.
- Respondent
- The Defendant, represented by counsel, participated in the negotiation and execution of the Deed of Settlement, agreeing to settle the matter as per the terms filed in court.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019
Where a suit is adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful agreement or compromise, the court shall order such agreement to be recorded and pass a decree in accordance therewith.
- 02
Mulla, Code of Civil Procedure Act of 1908 (14th Edition), page 1828
A consent decree is not appealable and the court must record a lawful adjustment or compromise and pass a decree in terms thereof.
- 03
Motoryessel Sepideh and Another vs. Yusuf Mohamed Yussuf and two Others (Civil Application No. 237 of 2013)
Where there is a lawful agreement or compromise, the court is bound to record a settlement once arrived at by the parties.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court is satisfied that the Deed of Settlement is lawful and settles the whole suit; therefore, it is registered and forms the judgment and decree of the court.
Court disposition
Suit marked settled by consent judgment based on the Deed of Settlement.
- Deed of Settlement registered and forms part of the consent judgment and decree
- Suit marked settled as per terms of the Deed of Settlement
Source and reliance status
TZHCCOMD · 5 November 2021
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHCCOMD
Judgment· 5 November 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF
TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)
AT DAR ES SALAAM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 37 OF 2021
VODACOM TANZANIA PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY........................................... PLAINTIFF
VERSUS 247 COMMUNICATION LIMITED DEFENDANT Last Order: 29/10/2021 Judgment: 05/11/2021
CONSENT JUDGMENT This suit was brought to<the^ attention of this court following a plaint filed by^tfie Plaintiff on 23rd March, 2020. TheyPlaihtiff prays for judgment and decree against the Defendantsa^follows: \\ (a) J Payment of TZS 95,275,596.88 being the outstanding amount of taxes paid by the Plaintiff on behalf of the Defendant. (b) Commercial interest at the Bank of Tanzania lending rate as applicable from the date of default which was 5th October 2020 to the date of Judgment Page 1 of 5 Interest of the decretal sum at the Court's rate at 7% per annum from the date of default judgment to the date of full payment; and (d) Costs of this suit. (e) Any other or futher reliefs as the Honourable Court will deem just to grant. When this case was called on for Mention on the 29th October, 2021, Ms Natasha Mukangara'and Pascal A vX Mwanyika legal counsels represeht^d^th'&Praintiff while the Defendant enjoyed thelSgal^eiXe of Mr. Noel X?XxXz Sanga, learned advocated- ( /X x When Ms^l^as^seized the moments to address the Court,^shexinforrried this Court that the parties have manage'd^to negotiate a settlement out of Court and a Deeq^fS^tfement was already filed in Court. In view of that, she prayed that the same be recorded as forming the judgment and decree of this Court. I have gone through the Deed of Settlement executed by the two parties and filed in this Court. The same was
made and filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019. Page 2 of 5 Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap.33. R.E, 2019 provides as follows: "Where it is proved to the satisfaction of the court that a suit has been adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful agreement or compromise, or where the defendant satisfies the plaintiff^in respect of the whole or any partxpf the subject matter of the^uit, the court shall order sujjh^agree^Fent^ compromise or satisfaction^ recorded, and^hall^passrar^ecree in accordance merewith\so far as it \\ V relates'to the suit.\\_Z As the above^orovi^^ provides, once a Deed of Settlemen^Ke^ered^Td'Yiled in Court, the Court must be satisfied tr^Titss^a lawful Deed and it does, indeed, adjuCt the^suit 'either wholly or partially and, thereafter, the Court shall record it, thereby passing a decree in accordance therewith, and so far as it relates to the suit. According to Mulla, the Code of Civil Procedure Act of 1908 (14th Edition), on page 1828: "The rule gives a mandate to, the Court to record a lawful adjustment Page 3 of 5 or compromise and pass, a decree in terms of such compromise or adjustment. Such a consent decree is not appealable....When the agreement relates to the whole suit, the Court on being invited by the parties, record the agreement, and pass a decree in accordance with the agreement and the
suit stops there." It was also the emphasis of the; Court of^ppeal of Tanzania in the case of Motoryessel Sepicieh and V' Another vs. Yusuf Molwfned^Yussuf and two Others (Civil Application No>237 of/2013) (Unreported) that: y^^where^there is a lawful agreement N^fccompromise the court is bound to a record a settlement arrived at by the parties." once I have examined the Deed of Settlement which it seeks to settle the whole suit. I am satisfied as to its is lawfulness and effect of settling the whole suit once and for all. In view of the above, the same is hereby registered and shall form part and parcel of this Consent Judgment of the Court, as well as its decree. Page 4 of 5 The present suit, therefore, is marked settled at the instance of the parties' terms and conditions set out in their Deed of Settlement executed and filed in this Court on the 29th October 2021. It is so ordered DATED AT DAR-ES-SALAAM ON THIS DAY 05th OF NOVEMBER 2021 Page 5 of 5
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.