volcano logistics t ltd vs emmanuel wilbard 2021 tzhcld 195 30 june 2021
The applicant's delay was justified due to technical issues with the electronic filing system, and the computation of time excludes the date of service, making the application for revision timely. The right to be heard is paramount and granting the extension does not prejudice the respondent.
- Citation
- volcano logistics t ltd vs emmanuel wilbard 2021 tzhcld 195 30 june 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Volcan Logistics (T) Ltd; Respondent: Emmanuel Wilbard
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Computation of Limitation Period, Right to Be Heard, Electronic Filing, Revision of CMA Award
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Volcan Logistics (T) Ltd
Applicant
Emmanuel Wilbard
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient reason for extension of time to file revision application
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's delay was justified due to technical issues with the electronic filing system, and the computation of time excludes the date of service, making the application for revision timely. The right to be heard is paramount and granting the extension does not prejudice the respondent.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Applicant to file the intended Revision application within 30 days from the date of this order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment