NA TZHC Mwanza2
Conviction unsafe due to reliance on uncorroborated identification and failure to produce the green army shirt as an exhibit; appellant not found with stolen cattle and his explanation was not adequately investigated.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- NA TZHC Mwanza2
- Parties
- Appellant: Wambura s/o Itibe @ Robi s/o Wambura Itiebe; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 8 July 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- conviction quashed, sentence set aside
- Legal Topics
- Cattle Theft, Evidence, Identification, Exhibits
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wambura s/o Itibe @ Robi s/o Wambura Itiebe
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was properly identified as one of the cattle thieves
- 2 Whether the conviction was safe in absence of the green army shirt as an exhibit
- 3 Whether the appellant's explanation for his presence at the scene was considered
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction unsafe due to reliance on uncorroborated identification and failure to produce the green army shirt as an exhibit; appellant not found with stolen cattle and his explanation was not adequately investigated.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed, sentence set aside
Orders
- Appellant acquitted and released from custody
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA (coRA MUSTAFA, J.A., QMAR, J.A.And MAPIGA1IO,Ag._J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 187 WAMBURA s/o IT1BE @ ROBI s/o WAMBURA ITE1BE . . APPELLAT VERSUS (Appeal from the conviction of the High Court of Tanzania at Musoma) (Katiti, J.) dated the 8th day of July, 1986 in Economic Crimes Case No.19 Of 1985 JUDGNEJNT OF THE COURT MUST!FA,J.A.: The appellant was convicd of cattle theft in the Economic Crimes Court. He was sentenced t0 10 years imprisonment. P.W.2 was herding his cattle. When P.W.2 was temporarily away chasing his goats, the herd of cattle was driven away by thieves. When P,W.2 returned and found his cattle gone, he stood on an anthill and he said he could see two persons at a distance driving away the cattle. P.W.2 raised an alarm and gave chase. P..W.3 was among those who answered the alarm and followed the thieves. F.W.2 alleged that one of the thieves was w.atg a green army shirt. F.W.2 and F.W.3 gave chase and on the way recovered 10 heads of cattle. At that stage P.W.2 went off to the nearest village t0 make a report. F.W.3 continued with the chase. P.W.3 arrived .at a bush near the Kitache River and there recovered several more head of cattle. In the bush F.W.3 saw two persons, both armed with pangas. One of them was the appellant, who,alleged P.W.3, was wearing a green army shirt. P.W.3 and his companions beat up the two persons one of whom died from their injuries inflicted. . . . . . -2- be The deceased turned out tohe appellant's brother. The appellant tried to escape but was caught and was handed over to the village Chairman P.W.4. F.W.5, a Police Officer, to whom a report was subsequently made, saw the appellant on a stretcher at the Kiongera dispensary. The appellant was injured, and P.W.5 stated that the appellant's wound was bound with a green army shirt. The appellant alleged that P.W.3 and his group arrived at the bush near the Kitachi river when the appellant and his deceased brother were cutting trees and sisal poles for a hut. His deceased brother was 12 years old. P.W.3 and his group were suspiciou9 and his younger brother was speared 'by one of the group. The appellant was beaten up. The appellant alleged that at one stage he was released and as he was goirg away he was caught up and re—arrested and beaten. At about that time the village Chairman F.W.4 came and the appellant lost tonsiousne&e. F.W.4 the village Chairman testified. He stated that he received a report from P.W.2 of cattle theft. He assembled some villagers near the Kitachi river. He saw the appellant walking from the direction of Kurutani village going towards Kikomesi villaggr. The appellant was empty handed. He saw the villagers chasing and arresting the appellant. When he went up to the appellant, he found the appellant wounded and badly beaten up. At the trial, the green army shirt was 0t produced as an exhibit. The appellant was identified as one of the cattle thieves by virtue of the green army shirt he was allegedly wearing, • and by nothing else. The appellant was not found with any stolen cattle. The green army shirt was a necessar, ' exhibit, and it was not produced. The appellant was found at a bush near the Kitachi River. He gave an explanation of his presence there. He said he was cutting sisal poles for a hut and that would account for him and his brother having..n pangas. No evidence was forthcoming as to whether the story given by the appellant could have been true. The only reference t0 this matter was by P.W.3 who stated .. ./3. - 3-. notes were picked up from room N0. 2 and were checked against the numbers of the currency notes that were written cn a piece of paper. Witnesses who were present in the dini*g room like F.W.l and 9, P.W.4 and 5 testified t0 either seeing the money being thrown or seeing Mr. Mbaku being surrounded and put under arrest. The respondent Mr. Mbaku made an unsworn sbatement. He stated that he was inves1igating a case concerning F.W.2 William Lugola whose case was withdrawn by the Distriet Court at the request of the prosecution. Mr. Mbaku admitted replying to a letter of F.W.2 on 1.3.82 to the effect that this case was still under investigation. He said he was not approached again by P.W.2. But after the withdrawal of this case of P.W.2, he Mr. Mbaku heard that one Anthony Joseph, P.W.2 Lugola and Mr. IVflc.y were preparing f a trap to catch him receiving a bribe. Again between July and August, 1980 he got information from Salum Tewa D.W.2 that some people wanted to give him money so that he could trap Mr. Mbaku. On the 20th November, 1980 he reported for duty at the police station about 7.30 aomf and at 7.45 a.m. he went to town to ,arrest people and at the market place he was stopped byone Abel who told him that his relative was waiting for him in room No. 8 Buluba Guest House and that this information was whom conveyed t0 bel by a police officer he met at Baluba Guest House that morning. Mr. Nbaku quidcly went there, reached the door of room 8 and knocked and the door was opened by F.W.2. He knew then that he was cheated. He decided t0 leave and when he wa at the canteen and three paces to rection roôm r.W.6 Nest o r Mssaba emerged from room 1o. 2 and stopped him and told him that he had received a bribe and had thrown the money in room N0 . 2. F.V.8 then went infront of him and F.W.3 went from behind and another man appeared and they all surrounded him. Mr. Mbaku called four witnesses. D.W.l Kabuzi Mwikola, Officer incharge C.I.D. Nzega confirmed that he did instruct Mr. Mbaku his junior in March, 1980 to reply to a letter written by F.W.2 about the stage in which his case had reached and he tendered the letter Exh. D.l. D.W.2 Salum Tewa the Shoe maker said he was approached pq epnC aq. ,eT Tgdde qsl aq qoiqr seiodex3stp eq. -j- •wiq OJS3p O. SesSaUqiM uoinoesoid xetpo puLa pnb uot.druJO3—pu eq. &q peunOw eq O pq du ewixj eoqee U qqS92nS O ao ug pTA9 eqçpao Ou st aaalql uiqO puv T ToT T os pip n :qv qW Jj peqSiSe peonpp eoueptie eq •Vjos uoiqnoesod aTil. epqs oq . 2uxq ~ gu v pts pvq flq-.J 4.UepUOdSeJ eqq jo sas u -tz.t MOJ eqq. ;oeuou 'St -t s •ueqs &tSnOtxes ueeq eiq ueq. p -Tiot aSnOJ qsen eq. Oq. wtq p9 -flO puv 9uivaow 9qT uT rL 3ye qlq .x oq. I- UDM Oqm eq Sz 4t 3Md JO &1OS OT4 1 9°H Tsano vcLr l rq q- v nq •.xjpj J O SM eJeqq pS OTM uOSied aq. 09 V 94. O. puv laqif t7Mcr JO iIO.S etfl. &JJ[O O. SS3U znOO u S peijo .uteq wtq O. pe 9At( tIW q.T Uqq. U3AT l-T JI - MI T@qV - alq &q IOU Ojjq q peuOpUeW TOU SM uuieot1Od stq. jo ewu eqq. ec q. 9 Xje w aqT wOij nq •.xjj qoe; puv OS OT w -rq pOO. saoqvl prxc L,2azX ut mauX eq wOqM uweotiod v pts otp pu& 1eQ. ü'eoiJtUtS OSIle St Me1 •Jj SM TT utieo SVM epnC -rtx. eq. qe •tri Tv .xeuostjd puuxe.x aqq. jo euieu eqq. oi -c ou pip - •wtq peSeTeJ eq pu 14 ieuOsd puweI e74 1 &exew peMOqB TMI ieste ewu s -rq q.Lqm inOo qq4 jjaq. cMct PTP "° jest2e.x eqq. UT TOU st eursu sTH •dn :oo - eq u -t 9 J G -qT s - toTJJO uonixOo—T.uv eqq. A'q qnOiq S Oqm uw Cifl. punO; eq uopqs eot1od eqq. o. aaTeT peuinqei MI UqM 0S Op Oq. eefl pMO -I -2 eq 'etO.iequt O paqu eqq_ wOqM uu sTtotJ;o UOTTdnaaoo—TquV o. u9T4m vO u s RuTpLIS uotq.s eoTTOd eq SM eq pçs eOTTod ;o JoGodsut—qns P oqm,2vjkT 99MS)J MI SSeU -p4 xetfl0 si}{ •SSeUtM v su pe[t-O Ou Si SS9UM Sq pwe nq -alq R q peuopuew u -teq sep -tseq qdeso £uOq.0 •rqj 'xj uTdd.x, jo qoC aTatIT op oq. •snp s -tq noq uO - ~ qs eot1od -e2u s guiqS uç wtq P9 1. eS OaaOqUl PUU wtq pedd - s wq peseJ STT0TJJO uotdnXJO3_TuV i9 q, ,e T sqquow JflO[ •weqq. piOi o. sP OS uicuq oq. queM Pue pu -tw stq peuqo ei pe -ro e.xeM iT°TJJ° Uot n1Jo3—tuv pzeq eq uaqm q nq qo et. Op O. pee M.a t3J wnS Ma pS Os 'nq -jW &q p8tqseAU •ut3q 812M eso Sq. pu axqo TuTwtx3 utotj StM &uOquV •eqpxq v sv nq -aW o. 9AT3 ueqq. pnot eq qoiq —/000't •sq ceuoui q.deoo o. 99ake OT uOtisodojd qqIM qc1esO &uottuy euO Aq -D -