wastara juma selemani kipati vs hamisi selemani kipati 2018 tzhcld 21 20 april 2018

wastara juma selemani kipati vs hamisi selemani kipati 2018 tzhcld 21 20 april 2018

The application was dismissed for lack of merit as the applicant failed to establish sufficient grounds for the court to exercise its revisionary and supervisory powers.

Citation
wastara juma selemani kipati vs hamisi selemani kipati 2018 tzhcld 21 20 april 2018
Parties
Applicant: Wastara Juma Selemani Kipati; 1st Respondent: Hamisi Selemani Kipati; 2nd Respondent: Mkurugenzi Shule ya Sekondari Wasichana Mai Li Moja; 3rd Respondent: Rajabu Makala; 4th Respondent: Andrew Dengwada; 5th Respondent: Yohana Mjenzi; 6th Respondent: Roida Rashidi; 7th Respondent: Joyce John; 8th Respondent: Mwafrika Group Limited; 9th Respondent: Ally Ahamed Ally
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 April 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Revision and Supervisory Orders
Outcome
Application dismissed for lack of merit.
Legal Topics
Revisionary Powers, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Nullification of Sale, Distribution of Sale Proceeds
Source Language
English
Labour Law Revisionary Powers Supervisory Jurisdiction Nullification of Sale Distribution of Sale Proceeds

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wastara Juma Selemani Kipati

Applicant

Hamisi Selemani Kipati

1st Respondent

Mkurugenzi Shule ya Sekondari Wasichana Mai Li Moja

2nd Respondent

Rajabu Makala

3rd Respondent

Andrew Dengwada

4th Respondent

Yohana Mjenzi

5th Respondent

Roida Rashidi

6th Respondent

Joyce John

7th Respondent

Mwafrika Group Limited

8th Respondent

Ally Ahamed Ally

9th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Revision and Supervisory Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should invoke its revisionary and supervisory powers over CMA Reference No. CMA/DAR/KIB/08/45
  2. 2 Whether the sale and/or distribution of sale proceeds should be nullified or restrained

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed for lack of merit as the applicant failed to establish sufficient grounds for the court to exercise its revisionary and supervisory powers.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for lack of merit.

Orders

  • Application dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs specified.