water aid tanzania vs stc limited 2022 tzhccomd 259 1 september 2022
- Citation
- water aid tanzania vs stc limited 2022 tzhccomd 259 1 september 2022
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 1 September 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Application Withdrawn Before Hearing on Merits
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 1 September 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Application Withdrawn Before Hearing on Merits
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Since the underlying dispute in Misc. Commercial Cause No.8 of 2022 has been amicably settled, the present application is withdrawn at the instance of the applicant with no order as to costs.
Court disposition
Application withdrawn
Orders
- Miscellaneous Commercial Application No.49 of 2022 is marked withdrawn at the instance of the Applicant’s Counsel.
- Withdrawal is with no orders as to costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
Water Aid Tanzania
Applicant Counsel: Mr. Reginald Shirima, Ms Rahma KomboSTC Limited
Respondent Counsel: Ms Josepha Tewa, Mr. Emmanuel Safari03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Application Withdrawn Before Hearing on Merits
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the arbitral award should be set aside for lack of jurisdiction and serious irregularity
- 02
Whether the application should be withdrawn following amicable settlement
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The arbitral award should be declared of no effect and set aside due to lack of substantive jurisdiction and serious irregularity affecting the award.
- Respondent
- Parties have reached an amicable settlement in Misc. Commercial Cause No.8 of 2022 and seek withdrawal of the application.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court's inherent powers and practice
A matter settled amicably by parties may be withdrawn from court with no further prosecution.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Since the underlying dispute in Misc. Commercial Cause No.8 of 2022 has been amicably settled, the present application is withdrawn at the instance of the applicant with no order as to costs.
Court disposition
Application withdrawn
- Miscellaneous Commercial Application No.49 of 2022 is marked withdrawn at the instance of the Applicant’s Counsel.
- Withdrawal is with no orders as to costs.
Source and reliance status
TZHCCOMD · 1 September 2022
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHCCOMD
Judgment· 1 September 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF
TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)
AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. COMMERCIAL APPLICATION NO. 49 OF 2022 (Arising from Misc. Commercial Cause No.8 of 2022)
IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION UNDER THE NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COUNCIL (NCC) WATER AID TANZANIA ….........................................APPLICANT
VERSUS STC LIMITED…………………………………….………........RESPONDENT Last order: 25th AUGUST, 2022 Judgment: 01 SEPTEMBER, 2022
ST
RULING NANGELA, J. On the 12th April 2022, the Applicant did, by way of an originating summons and an affidavit file this Application in Court. The same was filed under sections 69(1) (b), section 69(3)(c), section 70(3)(b) and (d) and section 70(1) of the Arbitration Act, No.2 of 2020, [Currently to be read as: section 74 (1)(b), section 74(3)(c), section 74(3)(b) and (d) and section 74(1) of the Arbitration Act, Cap.15 R.E 2020, the Act having been revised in year 2020]. Briefly, the Applicant sought for the following reliefs: Page 1 of 5 1. A Declaration that the Award made by the National Construction Council is of no effect in whole on the grounds that, one, the Council Arbitrator did not have substantive jurisdiction and two, there is serious irregularity affecting the award.
2. The award be set aside in whole based on the above grounds; 3. Costs to follow the event and, 4. Any other relief(s) that the Honourable Court deems fit to grant. When the parties appeared before his Lordship Magoiga, J. for necessary orders on the 25th April 2022, they informed this Court that, they were engaged in negotiations with a view to dispose of their dispute amicably. However, the Court ( Magoiga J.,) was later informed that, there is pending before me a Misc. Commercial Cause No.8 of 2022 and prudently, the case file was reassigned to me as well for convenience in handling both matters. Page 2 of 5 On the 4th of July 2022, the parties, through their appointed advocates, appeared before me. The Applicant enjoyed the services of Mr. Reginald Shirima, learned Advocate, while Ms Josepha Tewa, learned advocate represented the Respondent. Upon addressing this Court, Mr Shirima informed me their progressing negotiations aimed at striking a consensus on how to resolve the matter amicably. He informed this Court that, a draft agreement in respect of the Misc. Commercial Cause No.8 of 2022 was being prepared and, that, once concluded the matters before the Court will be settled amicably. The sought after adjournment was granted thrice. On the 25th day of August 2022, the parties appeared in Court. On the material date the Applicant enjoyed the services of Ms Rahma Kombo,
learned Advocate while Mr. Emmanuel Safari, also a learned Advocate appeared for the Respondent. The Court was informed that, the parties were bent on withdrawing this application since they have reached an amicable settlement of the Misc. Commercial Cause No.8 of 2022. Page 3 of 5 Since this Court was yet to examine the Deed of Settlement which they alleged was filed in respect of the said Misc. Commercial Cause No.8 of 2022, I set the matter for mention for necessary orders on the 1st day of September 2022 at 8:30 am. On this 1st September 2022, the parties appeared before me and prayed to withdraw the current application from this Court with no orders as to costs the reason being that, the parties have amicably brought to an end the Misc. Commercial Cause No.8 of 2022. There being such a prayer the issue is whether I should grant it. The prayer by the Applicant being anchored on the Misc. Commercial Case No.08 of 2022, which was settled by the parties, I am in agreement that the current application cannot be further prosecuted since the Misc. Commercial Case No.08 of 2022 has been compromised. In view of the above, this Court settles for the following orders: 1. That, this Miscellaneous Commercial Cause No.49 of 2022 is hereby marked Page 4 of 5 withdrawn from this Court at the instance of the Applicant’s Counsel.
2. The withdrawal is with no orders as to costs. It is so ordered. DATED AT DAR-ES-SALAAM ON THIS 01ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 .........................................
DEO JOHN NANGELA
JUDGE Page 5 of 5
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.