20020430 TZCA Dar es Salaam 2
The application for leave to appeal was time-barred as the Law of Limitation Act, 1971 does not apply to the Court of Appeal and the application was not filed within the prescribed period under the Court's Rules. No sufficient grounds were shown for stay of execution as the allegations of irreparable loss and inability of the respondent to refund the decretal amount were unsubstantiated.
- Citation
- 20020430 TZCA Dar es Salaam 2
- Parties
- Applicant: WETCU Limited; Respondent: Michael Junga
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Reference / Ruling on Consolidated References From Single Judge Decisions
- Outcome
- References dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Stay of Execution, Limitation of Actions, Court of Appeal Rules
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WETCU Limited
Applicant
Michael Junga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Reference / Ruling on Consolidated References From Single Judge Decisions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal was time-barred
- 2 Whether the Law of Limitation Act, 1971 applies to proceedings in the Court of Appeal
- 3 Whether sufficient grounds were shown for stay of execution
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was time-barred as the Law of Limitation Act, 1971 does not apply to the Court of Appeal and the application was not filed within the prescribed period under the Court's Rules. No sufficient grounds were shown for stay of execution as the allegations of irreparable loss and inability of the respondent to refund the decretal amount were unsubstantiated.
Court Disposition
References dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment