whipaz vs amina salum and 2 others 2020 tzhcld 3831 14 december 2020

whipaz vs amina salum and 2 others 2020 tzhcld 3831 14 december 2020

Applicant advanced contradictory and insufficient reasons for delay; neither failure to obtain order nor lack of funds constitutes sufficient cause under the law. Application dismissed for lack of sufficient cause.

Citation
whipaz vs amina salum and 2 others 2020 tzhcld 3831 14 december 2020
Parties
Applicant: WHIPAZ; 1st Respondent: Amina Salum; 2nd Respondent: Zainabu Hussein; 3rd Respondent: Pendo Ako
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Sufficient Cause, Condonation, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Sufficient Cause Condonation Limitation of Actions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WHIPAZ

Applicant

Amina Salum

1st Respondent

Zainabu Hussein

2nd Respondent

Pendo Ako

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant had sufficient cause to justify the grant of condonation for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant advanced contradictory and insufficient reasons for delay; neither failure to obtain order nor lack of funds constitutes sufficient cause under the law. Application dismissed for lack of sufficient cause.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • application for extension of time is dismissed for lack of sufficient cause