william buzizi vs petro makula 2021 tzhc 2331 26 february 2021

william buzizi vs petro makula 2021 tzhc 2331 26 february 2021

The applicant failed to account for the entire period of delay and did not demonstrate how the alleged illegality prejudiced him or affected the decision. Therefore, sufficient cause for extension of time was not established.

Citation
william buzizi vs petro makula 2021 tzhc 2331 26 february 2021
Parties
Applicant: William Buzizi; Respondent: Petro Makula
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Ward Tribunal Procedure
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Illegality as Ground for Extension Ward Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Buzizi

Applicant

Petro Makula

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause for extension of time to file notice of appeal
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality in the Ward Tribunal's decision constitutes sufficient ground for extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for the entire period of delay and did not demonstrate how the alleged illegality prejudiced him or affected the decision. Therefore, sufficient cause for extension of time was not established.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Each party to bear own costs