william ernest nturo vs republic 2018 tzhcced 56 13 november 2018

william ernest nturo vs republic 2018 tzhcced 56 13 november 2018

Money laundering is an unbailable offence under Tanzanian law, and the High Court at the bail application stage lacks jurisdiction to assess the defectiveness of the charge sheet.

Citation
william ernest nturo vs republic 2018 tzhcced 56 13 november 2018
Parties
Applicant: William Ernest Nturo; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application at High Court, Corruption and Economic Crimes Division
Outcome
Application for bail dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail, Money Laundering, Jurisdiction, Defective Charge Sheet
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Ernest Nturo

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application at High Court, Corruption and Economic Crimes Division

  1. 1 Whether the offence of money laundering is bailable
  2. 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to assess the defectiveness of the charge sheet at this stage

Ratio Decidendi

Money laundering is an unbailable offence under Tanzanian law, and the High Court at the bail application stage lacks jurisdiction to assess the defectiveness of the charge sheet.

Court Disposition

Application for bail dismissed

Orders

  • Applicant to remain in custody