Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHCCOMD

in the matter of companies act of 2002 and in the matter of petition for winding up of china chang group ltd 2018 tzhccomd 17 13 february 2018

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The company passed a special resolution for winding up and is unable to pay its debts, with assets less than liabilities, satisfying statutory grounds for winding up under the Companies Act of 2002.

Court disposition

petition allowed

Orders

  • China Chang Group Limited is wound up under Section 279(1)(a) and (d) of the Companies Act of 2002.
  • Hans Francis Mamuya appointed as official liquidator for three months with powers under Sections 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, and 306 of the Companies Act of 2002.
  • Liquidator to file report on accounts for release under Section 307 of the Companies Act No. 12 of 2012.
  • No order for costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

China Chang Group Limited

Petitioner Counsel: Taher Hussein Muccadam

Amounts and remedies

  • Nominal Share Capital: TZS 100,000,000
  • Number of Shares: 10,000
  • Share Value: TZS 100,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Winding Up Petition / Final Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether China Chang Group Limited should be wound up by the court due to insolvency

Party arguments

Applicant
The company is trading under loss, unable to pay its debts, and its assets are less than its liabilities as evidenced by audited financial statements. A special resolution was passed to petition for winding up.
Respondent
No objection was filed.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 279(1)(a) Companies Act of 2002

    A company may be wound up by the court if it has resolved by special resolution and is unable to pay its debts.

  2. 02

    Section 280 Companies Act of 2002

    Circumstances for inability to pay debts include neglecting to pay a debt exceeding fifty thousand Tanzanian shillings for twenty-one days and assets being less than liabilities.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The company passed a special resolution for winding up and is unable to pay its debts, with assets less than liabilities, satisfying statutory grounds for winding up under the Companies Act of 2002.

Court disposition

petition allowed

  • China Chang Group Limited is wound up under Section 279(1)(a) and (d) of the Companies Act of 2002.
  • Hans Francis Mamuya appointed as official liquidator for three months with powers under Sections 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, and 306 of the Companies Act of 2002.
  • Liquidator to file report on accounts for release under Section 307 of the Companies Act No. 12 of 2012.
  • No order for costs.

Source and reliance status

TZHCCOMD · 13 February 2018

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHCCOMD

Judgment· 13 February 2018

in the matter of companies act of 2002 and in the matter of petition for winding up of china chang group ltd 2018 tzhccomd 17 13 february 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)

AT OAR ES SALAAM WINDING UP CAUSE NO. 113 OF 2017 IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT OF 2002 AND In the matter of Petition for Winding Up of

CHINA CHANG GROUP LIMITED PETITIONER

JUDGMENT Date of the Last Order: 09/02/2018 Date of the Judgment 13/02/2018 SEHEL, J. This is a judgment on a petition for winding up China Chang Group Limited, a limited liability company incorporated through a Certificate of Registration No. 101896with its registered office at Plot No. 32 Ismailia Street, Chang'ombe, Oar es Salaam. The petition is presented by the Company under Section 279 (1) (a) of the Companies Act of 2002 after a dully special resolution had been ~ 1 passed for the company to be wound up by the Court due to the reason that it is trading under loss. After filing the petition, pursuant to Rules 96 and 98 of the Companies (Insolvency) Rules GN 34 of 2014 a direction was given that the petition be served upon the Directors, Contributory, and Creditors of the Company and the registrar of the companies. It was further directed that the petitioner under Rule 99 (2) (b) of the Companies (Insolvency) Rules GN 34 of 2014 shall make an advertisement in the gazette or newspaper not less than seven working days after service of the petition and that a Certificate specifying the manner of advertisement be filed in court pursuant to Rule 102 of the Companies (Insolvency) Rules GN 34 of 2014. The petition was then fixed for hearing. At the hearing of the petition, no objection was filed thus the sole counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Taher Hussein Muccadam who appeared on

behalf of the petitioner submitted that the company was incorporated on 27th August, 2013 with nominal share capital of 100 million divided into 10,000 shares of 100,000 each and that it was 2 ~ carrying a businessof aluminium, glassworks,steel sheets, and alloys products. He said in 2015 the business begun to fluctuate that prompted the management to hold a meeting wherein a special resolution was passed that the director to make petition to the court for winding up the company. The counsel submitted that the company is running at loss such that it is unable to pay its debts as evidenced by its audited financial statement which is attached to the petition. He said the petitioner has to date failed to make payments to its creditors. He therefore prayed for the company to be wound up because the survival of it depends upon its financial capabilities as it was held in the case of Shell Tanzania Limited Vs Scandinavian Express Services Limited, Misc. Commercial Case No. 36 of 2005 (Unreported). I have carefully followed the submissions made by counsel Muccadam representing the petitioner and I gathered that he IS inviting this Court to issuean order of winding up of the petitioner. Section 279 of the Companies Act of 2002 provides that a company may be wound up by the court if the company has by 3 ~ special resolution resolved that the company be wound up by the court and that

such company is unable to pay its debts. Section 280 of the Companies Act of 2002 outlines the circumstances in which a company may be deemed to be unable to pay its debts. The circumstances are when a notice is served upon the company making a demand of a debt exceeding fifty thousand Tanzanian shillingsthen due and requiring the company to pay the same and the company has for a period of 3 weeks or twenty one days neglected to pay the sum, or to secure or compound for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor; and that the value of the company's assets is less than the amount of its liabilities (including contingent and prospective). As I said the petition was filed following the special resolution passed by the company directing the director to file to this Court a petition for winding up. The said resolution was passed on 10th day of April, 2017 and it is attached to the petition. Further, the petition is attached with its audited financial statement ending 31st day of December, 2015 that shows its total assets is less than its liabilities ~ 4 (both contingent and prospective liabilities) as such it cannot meet its debts due. Having taken all these matters into account, I am satisfied this is the fit case to grant the prayers made as such the petition is hereby allowed and the following orders are made:- 1) The petitioner, China Chang Group Limited with Certificate

of lncorporotion No. 101896 is hereby wound up under the provisions of Section 279 (1) (a) and (d) of the Companies Act of 2002; 2) In terms of Sections 294 of the Companies Act of 2002; Mr. Hans Francis Mamuya is do hereby appointed to act as official liquidator of the company for a period of three months within which he shall, subject to the control of the court, exercise all the powers enumerated under Sections 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, and 306 of the Companies Act Of2002;~ 5 3) The official liquidator upon realising all the property of the company or in his opinion there is no need of protracting liquidation, and has distributed a final dividend, if any, and adjusted the rights of the contributories and made a final return, if any, to the contributories, shall cause and file in court a report on his accounts for his release according to the provisions of Section 307 of the Companies Act No. 12 of 2012.

4) No order for costs is made since there is no objection filed. It is so ordered. Dated at Dar es Salaam this 13th day of February, 2018. B.M.A Sehel

JUDGE 13th day of February, 2018. 6

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Shell Tanzania Limited Vs Scandinavian Express Services Limited, Misc. Commercial Case No. 36 of 2005 (Unreported)

Case cited

Companies Act of 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Companies (Insolvency) Rules GN 34 of 2014

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.