CIVIL CASE WINNERS COMPANY
- Citation
- CIVIL CASE WINNERS COMPANY
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 13 August 2024
- Posture
- Civil Summary Suit / Summary Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 13 August 2024
- Posture
- Civil Summary Suit / Summary Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Defendant failed to obtain leave to defend or appear; thus, allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted and judgment is entered for the plaintiffs for the claimed amount.
Court disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs
Orders
- Defendant to pay TZS 12,516,900 to the plaintiffs
- No order as to costs
02
Material facts
Parties
The Hon. Attorney General
1st Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Anesius KamugishaThe Board of Trustees of the National Social Security Fund
2nd Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Anesius KamugishaWinners Company Ltd
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Statutory Contributions and Penalties Awarded: TZS 12,516,900
03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Summary Suit / Summary Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the defendant is liable to pay statutory social security contributions and penalties for delayed remittance
- 02
Whether summary judgment should be entered due to defendant's failure to obtain leave to defend
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The plaintiffs claim TZS 12,516,900 as statutory social security contributions and penalties for delayed remittance, asserting the defendant is a registered contributing member and failed to remit contributions from September 2019 to September 2023 despite demand notice.
- Respondent
- The defendant did not appear, file any defence, or seek leave to defend the suit.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code Cap 33 R.E 2019
In summary suits, defendant must obtain leave to defend; failure results in judgment for plaintiff.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Defendant failed to obtain leave to defend or appear; thus, allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted and judgment is entered for the plaintiffs for the claimed amount.
Court disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs
- Defendant to pay TZS 12,516,900 to the plaintiffs
- No order as to costs
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 13 August 2024
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 13 August 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA
MUSOMA SUB REGISTRY
AT MUSOMA CIVIL CASE NO. 000011795 OF 2024 REFERENCE NO. 202405221000011795
BETWEEN THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL............................................... 1st PLAINTIFF
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND.......................................................... 2nd PLAINTIFF
VERSUS WINNERS COMPANY LTD.............................................................. DEFENDANT
SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13th & 13th August, 2024 M. L. KOMBA, J.: In a way of summary suit, the 2nd plaintiff is claiming from defendant a sum of TZS. 12,516,900/= (Tanzanian Shillings Twelve Milion Five Hundred Sixteen Thousand and Nine Hundred Only) being a compulsory contribution of the defendant and that of employees at the rate of 10% to 10% respectively making a total of 20% of the employee wage. Being a registered contributing member, defendant was obliged to remit employees Page 1 of 3 contribution to the 2nd plaintiff each month. From the Plaint, the defendant delayed to remit in some months from September 2019 to September 2023 which also attracted statutory penalty and still accruing. In suits of this nature defendant has no automatic right to defend, the leave must be sought and obtained as per provisions of Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code Cap 33 R.E 2019. Undoubtedly, failure to obtain leave, the Plaintiff will be entitled to the Judgement and Decree on the amount claimed. From the record, defendant failed to obtain leave to defend regardless that he was served with summons. He did not show up in any of the scheduled date although he is aware of this. suit. That is to say, the Defendant has defaulted in obtaining leave to appear and defend the suit. Mr. Anesius Kamugisha who represented the Plaintiffs has prayed for a summary judgment and reliefs as per
plaint. The cited provision is to the effect that in default of the defendant obtaining such leave or of his appearance and defence in pursuance thereof, the allegations in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted. Page 2 of 3 It was pleaded by Plaintiffs that defendant is statutory body established under section 53 of the National Social Security Fund Act and is a registered contributing member. In effort to collect the amount, second plaintiff issued demand notice to defendant but in vain. Under Order XXXV Rule 2, I hereby pronounce judgment in favour of the plaintiffs and against the Defendant for the sum of TZS. 12,516,900/=. No order as to costs. DATED at MUSOMA this 13th day of August, 2024. M. L. KOMBA Judge Judgement delivered in chamber in the presence of Mr. Anesius Kamugisha for plaintiffs and in the absence of defendant as he did not show interest to defend the suit. M. L. KOMBA Judge 13th August, 2024 Page 3 of 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.