Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

WISTON RULING

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The application for extension of time is granted because the applicant's uncontested affidavit establishes sufficient cause for the delay, namely the late supply of judgment and proceedings.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Extension of time to file appeal granted
  • Appeal to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this order

02

Material facts

Parties

Wiston Mpiluka William

Applicant Counsel: John Msifuni Msuya

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Winfrida Ouko

Amounts and remedies

  • Sentence Imposed by District Court: life imprisonment 1
  • Time Granted for Filing Appeal: days 30

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant should be granted extension of time to file an appeal against the judgment of the District Court of Mkuranga

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant was convicted of an unnatural offence and sentenced to life imprisonment. He lodged a notice of intention to appeal and requested copies of judgment and proceedings, which were supplied late, causing the delay in filing the appeal.
Respondent
The respondent did not object to the application for extension of time.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court's reasoning in the present ruling

    Uncontested facts in an affidavit are deemed truthful and form the basis for granting relief.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The application for extension of time is granted because the applicant's uncontested affidavit establishes sufficient cause for the delay, namely the late supply of judgment and proceedings.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Extension of time to file appeal granted
  • Appeal to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this order

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 24 March 2025

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 24 March 2025

WISTON RULING

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA DAR ES SALAAM SUB-REGISTRY

DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.27053/24 ( C/f Criminal Case No. 387 of 2023 in the District Court of Mkuranga at Mkuranga) WISTON MPILUKA WILLIAM………………………………………APPLICANT Vs. THE REPUBLIC…………………………………………………….RESPONDENT

RULING Date of last Order: 12-2-2025 Date of Ruling: 24-3-2025 B.K.PHILLIP,J The applicant moved this court under Section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap. 20 R.E. 2002, praying for an extension of time for filing an appeal against the judgment of the District Court of Mkuranga at Mkuranga. An affidavit sworn by the applicant supports the application, which is not contested. At the hearing of this application, the learned State Attorney, Winfrida Ouko, appeared for the Republic, while the learned Advocate, John Msifuni Msuya, appeared for the applicant. When invited to address the Court, Mr. Msuya adopted the contents of the applicant’s affidavit in support of this application in which the applicant 1 deposed as follows: that he was arraigned on an unnatural offence contrary to section 154 (1) (a) and (2) of the Penal Code, in the District Court of Mkuranga at Mkuranga. Upon hearing of the case, on 13th February 2024, he was found guilty and sentenced to serve a life sentence. He lodged a notice of intention to appeal on 19th February 2024. He requested to be supplied with copies of the Judgment and proceedings, but they were not supplied to him promptly, as he received them on 30th May 2024. Thus, he filed this application. On her part, Ms. Ouko informed this court that she was not objecting to the application. In my considered view, this application has merit. The facts stated by the applicant in his affidavit have not been contested; therefore, they are truthful and accurately reflect what happened to the applicant. Thus, I grant the applicant an extension of time for filing his appeal. The same should be filed within thirty ( 30) days from the date of this order. Dated at Dar es Salaam this 24th day of March 2025 B.K.PHILLIP JUDGE. 2 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap. 20 R.E. 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 154(1)(a) and (2) of the Penal Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.