WISTON RULING
- Citation
- WISTON RULING
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 24 March 2025
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 24 March 2025
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The application for extension of time is granted because the applicant's uncontested affidavit establishes sufficient cause for the delay, namely the late supply of judgment and proceedings.
Court disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Extension of time to file appeal granted
- Appeal to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this order
02
Material facts
Parties
Wiston Mpiluka William
Applicant Counsel: John Msifuni MsuyaThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Winfrida OukoAmounts and remedies
- Sentence Imposed by District Court: life imprisonment 1
- Time Granted for Filing Appeal: days 30
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the applicant should be granted extension of time to file an appeal against the judgment of the District Court of Mkuranga
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant was convicted of an unnatural offence and sentenced to life imprisonment. He lodged a notice of intention to appeal and requested copies of judgment and proceedings, which were supplied late, causing the delay in filing the appeal.
- Respondent
- The respondent did not object to the application for extension of time.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court's reasoning in the present ruling
Uncontested facts in an affidavit are deemed truthful and form the basis for granting relief.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The application for extension of time is granted because the applicant's uncontested affidavit establishes sufficient cause for the delay, namely the late supply of judgment and proceedings.
Court disposition
Application granted
- Extension of time to file appeal granted
- Appeal to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of this order
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 24 March 2025
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 24 March 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA DAR ES SALAAM SUB-REGISTRY
DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.27053/24 ( C/f Criminal Case No. 387 of 2023 in the District Court of Mkuranga at Mkuranga) WISTON MPILUKA WILLIAM………………………………………APPLICANT Vs. THE REPUBLIC…………………………………………………….RESPONDENT
RULING Date of last Order: 12-2-2025 Date of Ruling: 24-3-2025 B.K.PHILLIP,J The applicant moved this court under Section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap. 20 R.E. 2002, praying for an extension of time for filing an appeal against the judgment of the District Court of Mkuranga at Mkuranga. An affidavit sworn by the applicant supports the application, which is not contested. At the hearing of this application, the learned State Attorney, Winfrida Ouko, appeared for the Republic, while the learned Advocate, John Msifuni Msuya, appeared for the applicant. When invited to address the Court, Mr. Msuya adopted the contents of the applicant’s affidavit in support of this application in which the applicant 1 deposed as follows: that he was arraigned on an unnatural offence contrary to section 154 (1) (a) and (2) of the Penal Code, in the District Court of Mkuranga at Mkuranga. Upon hearing of the case, on 13th February 2024, he was found guilty and sentenced to serve a life sentence. He lodged a notice of intention to appeal on 19th February 2024. He requested to be supplied with copies of the Judgment and proceedings, but they were not supplied to him promptly, as he received them on 30th May 2024. Thus, he filed this application. On her part, Ms. Ouko informed this court that she was not objecting to the application. In my considered view, this application has merit. The facts stated by the applicant in his affidavit have not been contested; therefore, they are truthful and accurately reflect what happened to the applicant. Thus, I grant the applicant an extension of time for filing his appeal. The same should be filed within thirty ( 30) days from the date of this order. Dated at Dar es Salaam this 24th day of March 2025 B.K.PHILLIP JUDGE. 2 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.