Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHCCOMD

yara tanzania ltd vs vitus longinus mgaya 2023 tzhccomd 87 27 march 2023

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The suit is wholly adjusted and settled by the Deed of Settlement filed by the parties, which meets the lawfulness requirements and constitutes the decree of the court.

Court disposition

settled by consent

Orders

  • The Deed of Settlement filed by the parties is recorded and constitutes the decree of the court
  • The suit is marked settled at the consent of the parties

02

Material facts

Parties

Yara Tanzania Limited

Plaintiff Counsel: Reuben Robert

Vitus Longinus Mgaya

Defendant Counsel: Ela Tupa, Evans Lazaro

Amounts and remedies

  • Outstanding Purchase Price for Fertilizers: TZS 138,358,500

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Commercial Case / Consent Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The defendant breached the contract for supply of fertilizers and owes TZS 138,358,500 plus interest and damages.
Respondent
The parties have engaged in discussions and agreed to settle the matter amicably by filing a Deed of Settlement.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap.33 R.E 2019

    A lawful and enforceable deed of settlement adjusts the suit wholly

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The suit is wholly adjusted and settled by the Deed of Settlement filed by the parties, which meets the lawfulness requirements and constitutes the decree of the court.

Court disposition

settled by consent

  • The Deed of Settlement filed by the parties is recorded and constitutes the decree of the court
  • The suit is marked settled at the consent of the parties

Source and reliance status

TZHCCOMD · 27 March 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHCCOMD

Judgment· 27 March 2023

yara tanzania ltd vs vitus longinus mgaya 2023 tzhccomd 87 27 march 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UNITED REPUBLIC OF THE

TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) AT DAR-ES-SALAAM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 129 OF 2022 YARA TANZANIA LIMITED…………......................................PLAINTIFF

VERSUS VITUS LONGINUS MGAYA ……….................................. DEFENDANT

CONSENT JUDGEMENT Last order: 27th February 2023 Judgement: 27th February 2023 NANGELA, J., The Plaintiff herein filed this suit praying for Judgement and Decree against the Defendants as follows: 1. A declaration that the Defendant is in breach of the contract for supply of fertilizers between the parties herein.

2. An order for payment of TZS 138,358,500 being an outstanding purchase price for fertilizers supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant; 3. Payment of interest at the rate of 5% per month from the date when the debt became due to the date of judgement. Page 1 of 3 4. Interest on the decretal amount at Court’s rate from the date of judgment to the date of full satisfaction.

5. General damages.

6. Costs of this suit.

7. Any other relief as the Court may deem fit to grant. On the 10th January 2023, the Defendant herein filed a written statement of defense, and, on the 14th day of February 2023 the Plaintiff filed a reply. The matter was set for a 1st Pre-trial Conference on the 28th February 2023. When the parties appeared before me on the material date, the Plaintiff enjoyed the legal services of Mr. Reuben Robert, learned Advocate while Ms. Ela Tupa and Mr. Evans Lazaro, learned Advocates represented the Defendant. On the material date, this Court was informed that, the Parties have exercised their wisdom and engaged in fruitful discussions to have the suit settled amicably. They informed this Court that, once such discussions are done, the parties will file their Deed of Settlement in this Court and prayed that, the same be recorded as forming the Judgment and Decree of the Court. This Court welcomed the submissions and on the very same date, i.e., the 28th day of February 2023, the parties inked and filed a Deed of Settlement in this Court. I have taken time to examine the Deed of Settlement filed in this Court. Having examined the said Deed, I am satisfied that the same meets the lawfulness requirements of an enforceable Deed and falls within Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap.33 R.E 2019. It means, therefore, that the Page 2 of 3 suit has been adjusted wholly by the

Deed of Settlement filed in this Court on 28th of February 2023. With that in mind, this Court hereby proceeds and records the Deed of Settlement. The suit is, therefore, marked “settled” at the consent of the parties, and, on the basis of terms contained in their duly signed Deed of Settlement, which Deed of Settlement shall constitute “the Decree of this Court”. It is so ordered. DATED AT DAR-ES-SALAAM ON THIS 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2023 ...................................

DEO JOHN NANGELA

JUDGE Page 3 of 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Procedure Code, Cap.33 R.E 2019, Order XXIII rule 3

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.