yara tanzania ltd vs vitus longinus mgaya 2023 tzhccomd 87 27 march 2023
- Citation
- yara tanzania ltd vs vitus longinus mgaya 2023 tzhccomd 87 27 march 2023
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 27 March 2023
- Posture
- Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 27 March 2023
- Posture
- Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The suit is wholly adjusted and settled by the Deed of Settlement filed by the parties, which meets the lawfulness requirements and constitutes the decree of the court.
Court disposition
settled by consent
Orders
- The Deed of Settlement filed by the parties is recorded and constitutes the decree of the court
- The suit is marked settled at the consent of the parties
02
Material facts
Parties
Yara Tanzania Limited
Plaintiff Counsel: Reuben RobertVitus Longinus Mgaya
Defendant Counsel: Ela Tupa, Evans LazaroAmounts and remedies
- Outstanding Purchase Price for Fertilizers: TZS 138,358,500
03
Procedural history
Posture
Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the defendant breached the contract for supply of fertilizers
- 02
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to payment for outstanding purchase price
- 03
Whether the parties' settlement is lawful and enforceable
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The defendant breached the contract for supply of fertilizers and owes TZS 138,358,500 plus interest and damages.
- Respondent
- The parties have engaged in discussions and agreed to settle the matter amicably by filing a Deed of Settlement.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap.33 R.E 2019
A lawful and enforceable deed of settlement adjusts the suit wholly
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The suit is wholly adjusted and settled by the Deed of Settlement filed by the parties, which meets the lawfulness requirements and constitutes the decree of the court.
Court disposition
settled by consent
- The Deed of Settlement filed by the parties is recorded and constitutes the decree of the court
- The suit is marked settled at the consent of the parties
Source and reliance status
TZHCCOMD · 27 March 2023
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHCCOMD
Judgment· 27 March 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UNITED REPUBLIC OF THE
TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) AT DAR-ES-SALAAM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 129 OF 2022 YARA TANZANIA LIMITED…………......................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS VITUS LONGINUS MGAYA ……….................................. DEFENDANT
CONSENT JUDGEMENT Last order: 27th February 2023 Judgement: 27th February 2023 NANGELA, J., The Plaintiff herein filed this suit praying for Judgement and Decree against the Defendants as follows: 1. A declaration that the Defendant is in breach of the contract for supply of fertilizers between the parties herein.
2. An order for payment of TZS 138,358,500 being an outstanding purchase price for fertilizers supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant; 3. Payment of interest at the rate of 5% per month from the date when the debt became due to the date of judgement. Page 1 of 3 4. Interest on the decretal amount at Court’s rate from the date of judgment to the date of full satisfaction.
5. General damages.
6. Costs of this suit.
7. Any other relief as the Court may deem fit to grant. On the 10th January 2023, the Defendant herein filed a written statement of defense, and, on the 14th day of February 2023 the Plaintiff filed a reply. The matter was set for a 1st Pre-trial Conference on the 28th February 2023. When the parties appeared before me on the material date, the Plaintiff enjoyed the legal services of Mr. Reuben Robert, learned Advocate while Ms. Ela Tupa and Mr. Evans Lazaro, learned Advocates represented the Defendant. On the material date, this Court was informed that, the Parties have exercised their wisdom and engaged in fruitful discussions to have the suit settled amicably. They informed this Court that, once such discussions are done, the parties will file their Deed of Settlement in this Court and prayed that, the same be recorded as forming the Judgment and Decree of the Court. This Court welcomed the submissions and on the very same date, i.e., the 28th day of February 2023, the parties inked and filed a Deed of Settlement in this Court. I have taken time to examine the Deed of Settlement filed in this Court. Having examined the said Deed, I am satisfied that the same meets the lawfulness requirements of an enforceable Deed and falls within Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap.33 R.E 2019. It means, therefore, that the Page 2 of 3 suit has been adjusted wholly by the
Deed of Settlement filed in this Court on 28th of February 2023. With that in mind, this Court hereby proceeds and records the Deed of Settlement. The suit is, therefore, marked “settled” at the consent of the parties, and, on the basis of terms contained in their duly signed Deed of Settlement, which Deed of Settlement shall constitute “the Decree of this Court”. It is so ordered. DATED AT DAR-ES-SALAAM ON THIS 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2023 ...................................
DEO JOHN NANGELA
JUDGE Page 3 of 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.