yesse mrisho vs sania abdul 2023 tzca 215 3 may 2023

yesse mrisho vs sania abdul 2023 tzca 215 3 may 2023

The application for review was dismissed because the alleged errors were not manifest on the face of the record, were not part of the issues determined by the Court in the appeal, and were essentially factual matters not suitable for review under rule 66(1)(a).

Citation
yesse mrisho vs sania abdul 2023 tzca 215 3 may 2023
Parties
Applicant: Yesse Mrisho; Respondent: Sania Abdul
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
3 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Matrimonial Property Division, Review of Appellate Judgment, Contribution to Matrimonial Assets
Source Language
English
Family Law Civil Procedure Matrimonial Property Division Review of Appellate Judgment Contribution to Matrimonial Assets

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yesse Mrisho

Applicant

Sania Abdul

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review of Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal judgment contained manifest errors on the face of the record justifying review under rule 66(1)(a) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009

Ratio Decidendi

The application for review was dismissed because the alleged errors were not manifest on the face of the record, were not part of the issues determined by the Court in the appeal, and were essentially factual matters not suitable for review under rule 66(1)(a).

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs