Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZCA

19870807 TZCA Dar es Salaam2

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The timing of the donation was due to the convenience of the headmistress and was fortuitous; no improper or corrupt motive was discerned in Mr. Shaba's conduct, and the allegation of bribery was not proved.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order for costs as appeal conducted under legal aid

02

Material facts

Parties

Yona Nguto Luwongo

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Rweyemamu

Austin Kapere Edward Shaba

1st Respondent

Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Donation Amount: TZS 2,500

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the donation of Shs. 2,500/- by Mr. Shaba to Mtwara Girls Secondary School constituted bribery under election law

Party arguments

Applicant
Mr. Shaba committed an act of bribery by donating money to the school during election time, allegedly to influence votes.
Respondent
The donation was made as part of parliamentary duties, timed for the convenience of the headmistress, and not intended as a corrupt act.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    High Court judgment, appellate review standard

    Proper evaluation and assessment of evidence by the trial judge is binding unless clearly wrong.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The timing of the donation was due to the convenience of the headmistress and was fortuitous; no improper or corrupt motive was discerned in Mr. Shaba's conduct, and the allegation of bribery was not proved.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • No order for costs as appeal conducted under legal aid

Source and reliance status

TZCA · 7 August 1987

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZCA

Judgment· 7 August 1987

19870807 TZCA Dar es Salaam2

·i i... J-~ ,r IN TII.S COURT OF APP:i:!ll, Oi 'J\d:TZ}JHA AT DAR ES ,Sf~Lf,ltM ---·-- ( ~~ MUSTAFA 2 J .A 09 omrn. 9 J·. /,.. And HJ\l'IGANO, 11{!, • J .ii.•) CIVIL li.PPEAL NO. 16 OF 1987 YONA NGUTO LU\10HGO •• • • • • APPELLANT AND 1. HON. AUSTIN ICAP::JRE SHJJ.lA. • • .1 ST '.LWSPOIIDENT 2. HON. ATTORlITJY G~NERLL. . • • • ZIID n:cs?mT.DZHT (AppGal fron the judc:nent 9 c1ecree :nd order of the Hi:;h Court of '11 onzanie at Mtwara) (Rubama 9 J.) d.at0d. 18th day of July 9 1986 in Miscellan12ous Civil C2use l~.J. 2 of 1985 JUDGI'iEtJT QJP T}f;.:; COURT OMAR 2 Mr. Yona N-:;uto LuwoDGo was a 112·tition0r in the election petition Miscellaneous Civil CGuse ~-!o. 2 of 1985 against Mr. Austin Kapere j~dward Shaba I the .successful candidate in 1985 General 11ections in the co:1kst\?d seat of Mtwara urban constituency. The second re.spom1ent in this appeal is the Attorney General. Mr. Luwone;o I s pe:tition woo disnissed.. In this appeal he has submitted thet I1'ir. t3haba had cm:inittcd on act of bribery. '11 hat is his only eround of complaint. It was concerned with the donation of Shs. 2,500/- by Nr. Shaba to Mtwara Girls .Secondary School. Mr. Shaba had gone to this school on 9th r.\'arch 9 1981 as part of his duties os a Member of Parliament to visit places of educ2tional and· political interest in his constituency. The school was one of the party branches~ two other schools

1·rer0 also visited by him that day as they were c:lso p3rty bronches. i''Ir. Shaba addressed this school on the constitutional chan::ces that Parliament had passed the previous year and as his visit coincided with the sports 1 presentation day he was asked t 0 l)resent .,;. ·:)rizGs to the students •• 0 0 •• /2. 2 which he d.id. The prizes were for sports activities. It was in evidence tha.t the sports teacher had : said that the school had no table tennis table for the stuJonts to prlll:C:t.i'Se on ancl that they were forced to go to other institutions for th2ir practices. To this the first respondent resi10nded by pr,:imioin:s to contribute towards its purchase if they coul: 1 discover the price. The price ' was communicated to him in a letter written by the sports te8cher Iialifed.ha dated 27/4/85 which he the first respondent received on 3/7/85. The evidence is to the effect that he was away from - Mtwara for about three months and. as soon as he received it he tried to contact the He:admistress but found the school closed. On 2/8/85 he managed to talk to the Headmistress about the table for table tennis and his proposed visit concerning that rIBtter but the school had just opened and the headmistress had some travelling to do and it was not a oonvenient time then for his visit. On 20/8/85 first respondent contacted the school asain about his donation and the headmistress

agreed they should meet the following day for the handing over of the money to the school. Counsel for the appellant ) Mr •.- Rweyemamu contended that Nr. Shaba had deliberately timed. the giving of this gLft and. that act ion converted an otherwise innocuous act into a corrupt transaction. He asked. why was money not paid earlier or sent by cheq_uc as soon as he had received. the letter on 3/7/85. Instead. Hr. Shaba waited for more than one and half months until it was elect ion tine before he r11ade the presentation. On 21.B.85 fir3t respondent went to the school and gave shs. 2,500/- to the headi;1istress in the presence of students who had c:issembled the r:1oney W3D then handed. to the head Birl, one Miss F8tu. 'l1he coreraony to,1k ten minutes and first respondent left in a hurry. ~hl·ee schocl girls gave evidence of this short cerer,10ny and one of then P. u. 3 ..... /3. - .........a.:-' .. ~ r 1 lo, - 3 - Zainabu Rashidi said. that first respondent told them at that meeting that he was a Parliamentary candidate ancl that they should. vote for him 9 but the other two girls P.W.5 Marry ~esi and P 1W16 Dorothina Philipa merely stated that the short address of first respondent wos restricted to sports d.evelopmenl P.w~ and P.W,6 stated that when the first respondent was bidd.~g the girls farewell he was heard to say that they would meet again du.ring the election campaign.

The headmistress, D.W,2, who wos present throughout at that meeting denied havirig heard Iv.ll', Sheba saying anything about meeting during election campnign as alleged by P1 W.5 and P.w.6 or about Mr. Sheba asking the girls to vote fo~ him as alleged by P •W ,3. The learned judge reviewed. and analysed the evidence of the witnesses at great length. He was satisfied that P.W,3 was a liar and that P.W.5 and P.W.6 could not have heard the remark allegedly made by Mr. Shaba as neither J)!W.2 the headmistress nor P,W.,4 a - - - tea,oQer who were present throughout tho short ceremony of the money donation had he:ard ony such remarks. The judge accepted. P,W,4 and. D.W.2 as witnesses of truth. As the trial judge had properly evc1luatod ond assessed the evidence, we are not in a position to say that he was wrong, The timing of the donation was due to the convenience of D.W,2 r the head.mistress and. it was fortuitous. 'l1he trial judge could. descern no improper or corrupt motive in the whole of Mr. Shabo's conduct surround.inc this transaction an,j ,·rn think that he was right. This is the only ground of appeal urged to nullify the elect.ion of first respond.ent. We find the nlJ.egation of corruption not proved., . We dis11iss the appeal. No order for _ -.. __ costs will be made in this appoal as the appeal has been conducted ~- under legal aid. . .· ; . / DATED a.t D.Aiv.ES SALAAM this 7th day of August, 1987. A. MUSTAFA JUST I CE OF APP]!JAL .. / / _,,,,,./ A. M1 A. OMAH ;" JUSTICE OF APPEAL D. P. HAPIGANO !1£• JUSTICE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the origin 8 1. t ' / //. .. ' . (J. H. MSOFFE)

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.