yustinian mulokozi vs republic 2016 tzca 679 16 february 2016

yustinian mulokozi vs republic 2016 tzca 679 16 february 2016

The evidence of the victim, corroborated by other witnesses and medical findings of injuries, was credible and sufficient to prove rape beyond reasonable doubt. Absence of sperms or blood does not negate the offence where penetration is established.

Citation
yustinian mulokozi vs republic 2016 tzca 679 16 february 2016
Parties
Appellant: Yustinian Mulokozi; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Evidence, Appeals, Burden of Proof
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yustinian Mulokozi

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the evidence established that PW1 was raped
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was properly identified as the perpetrator
  3. 3 Whether absence of medical evidence of sperms or blood negates rape

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence of the victim, corroborated by other witnesses and medical findings of injuries, was credible and sufficient to prove rape beyond reasonable doubt. Absence of sperms or blood does not negate the offence where penetration is established.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence upheld