N

N

The conviction was sound as the appellant fraudulently obtained money from Humud by false pretences, and the Minimum Sentences Act, 1972 did not apply since the victim was not a specified authority. The sentence of three years imprisonment was justified due to appellant's prior conviction and commission of offence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
N
Parties
Appellant: Yusufu Mtimbila; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
2 April 1973
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
False Pretences, Minimum Sentence, Sentencing, Fraud
Source Language
english
Criminal Law False Pretences Minimum Sentence Sentencing Fraud

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yusufu Mtimbila

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for obtaining goods by false pretences was sound
  2. 2 Whether the Minimum Sentences Act, 1972 applied to the offence
  3. 3 Whether the sentence of three years imprisonment was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was sound as the appellant fraudulently obtained money from Humud by false pretences, and the Minimum Sentences Act, 1972 did not apply since the victim was not a specified authority. The sentence of three years imprisonment was justified due to appellant's prior conviction and commission of offence while on bail.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction and sentence affirmed