yusufu same another vs hadija yusufu 2006 tzca 141 20 october 2006

yusufu same another vs hadija yusufu 2006 tzca 141 20 october 2006

The cumulative circumstances, including the respondent's reliance on legal aid, her counsel's error, and her financial and logistical difficulties, constituted sufficient cause for delay; thus, the High Court properly exercised its discretion in granting extension of time.

Citation
yusufu same another vs hadija yusufu 2006 tzca 141 20 october 2006
Parties
Appellant: Yusufu Same; Appellant: Hawa Dada; Respondent: Hadija Yusuf
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 October 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Ruling on Extension of Time
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Probate and Administration, Limitation of Actions, Discretion of Court
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yusufu Same

Appellant

Hawa Dada

Appellant

Hadija Yusuf

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Ruling on Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause was shown for extension of time to apply for leave to appeal
  2. 2 Whether negligence of counsel constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time
  3. 3 Whether financial constraints and logistical difficulties constitute sufficient cause for delay

Ratio Decidendi

The cumulative circumstances, including the respondent's reliance on legal aid, her counsel's error, and her financial and logistical difficulties, constituted sufficient cause for delay; thus, the High Court properly exercised its discretion in granting extension of time.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.