hassani v tanzania application 29 of 2015 2019 afchpr 36 26 september 2019

hassani v tanzania application 29 of 2015 2019 afchpr 36 26 september 2019

The Court determined that, in the interests of justice, the proceedings should be re-opened to allow the Respondent State's response to reparations submissions and the Applicant's reply.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
hassani v tanzania application 29 of 2015 2019 afchpr 36 26 september 2019
Parties
Applicant: Yusuph Hassani; Respondent: United Republic of Tanzania
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Application / Order on Re Opening of Pleadings
Outcome
Proceedings re-opened
Legal Topics
Right to Be Heard, Fair Trial, Reparations
Source Language
en
Human Rights Law Right to Be Heard Fair Trial Reparations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yusuph Hassani

Applicant

United Republic of Tanzania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Order on Re Opening of Pleadings

  1. 1 Whether the Applicant's right to be heard was violated during trial and appeals
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent State's delay in responding to reparations submissions should be excused

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that, in the interests of justice, the proceedings should be re-opened to allow the Respondent State's response to reparations submissions and the Applicant's reply.

Court Disposition

Proceedings re-opened

Orders

  • Proceedings in Application No. 029/2015 are re-opened.
  • Respondent State's response to reparations submissions is deemed duly filed and to be served on the Applicant.