zaidi jumanne zaidi administrator of the estate of the late jumanne zaidi vs pili rajabu abdallahadministratrix of the estate of the late rajabu abdallah mbano 2021 tz
The appeal is improperly before the court due to failure to attach a copy of the decree, a mandatory requirement under Order XXXIX rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- zaidi jumanne zaidi administrator of the estate of the late jumanne zaidi vs pili rajabu abdallahadministratrix of the estate of the late rajabu abdallah mbano 2021 tz
- Parties
- Appellant: ZAIDI S/O JUMANNE ZAIDI (Administrator of the Estate of the late JUMANNE S/O ZAIDI); Respondent: PILI RAJABU ABDALLAH (Administratrix of the estate of the late RAJABU S/O ABDALLAH MBANO)
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out as improperly before the court.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Procedural Requirements, Attachment of Decree
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ZAIDI S/O JUMANNE ZAIDI (Administrator of the Estate of the late JUMANNE S/O ZAIDI)
Appellant
PILI RAJABU ABDALLAH (Administratrix of the estate of the late RAJABU S/O ABDALLAH MBANO)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to attach a copy of the decree renders the appeal incompetent
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is improperly before the court due to failure to attach a copy of the decree, a mandatory requirement under Order XXXIX rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out as improperly before the court.
Orders
- Appeal struck out for failure to attach a copy of the decree.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OFTANZANIA (IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY OF KIGOMA) AT KIGOMA (LAND DIVISION] APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS LAND APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2021 (Arising from Land Appeal No. 23/2021 of the District Land and Housing Tribunal, Kigoma before Waziri M.H. Chairman) ZAIDIS/O JUMANNE ZAIDI (Administrator of the , Estate of the late JUMANNE S/O ZAIDI)............ ................ X.. APPELLANT VERSUS W PILI RAJABU ABDALLAH (Administratrix of the'estate \X y Of the late RAJABU S/O ABDALLAH M^BANO),.<X.';.....\j{ RESPONDENT 02/12/2021 & 06/12/2021 L.M. MLACHA, J / When the appeal vyasxallecbfdr hearing, counsel for the respondent, Mr. Kabuguzi raised,aHjobjecfibri that the appeal is improperly before the \ \ \\ courrfpr failure to'attach a copy of the decree in the Petition of Appeal. He cited orderXXXIX rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Code Act, Cap. 33 R.E. 2019 as his authority. He also asked the court to follow its decision made in Yahaya Ngilo v. Ally Selemani, DC Civil Appeal No. 19 of 2018 (High Court Tabora). The respondent agreed that he did not attach a copy of the decree of the District Land and Housing Tribunal extracted Page 1 of 3 from its decision made in Application No. 63/2012. He however argued that he attached a copy of the decision and other documents which he thinks that they are enough. He added that he is not a lawyer. My reading of order XXXIX rule 1(1) of the CPC did not give me any room to accommodate the appeal. Rule 1(1) state in part that. Every appeal be preferred in the form of a memorandum signed by the appellant or his advocate and presented to the High Court and the memorandum shall be accompanied by a copy of the decree appealed from and unless the court dispenses therewith, a copy of the judgment. The requirement to attach a copy of the decree is mandatory. It is not discretional. Whereas the court can do way with the requirement to attach a copy of the judgment, it cannot do so in respect of a decree. That was also the position of this court in Yahaya Ngilo (supra). It follows that the appeal before me is improperly before the court for failure to attach a copy of the decree of the District Land and Housing Page 2 of 3 Court: Ruling delivered in chamber in the presence of the appellant and in the absence of the respondent, represented by Miss Joyce Godfrey, Advocate. Page 3 of 3