19870805 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The division of matrimonial assets by the lower courts did not incline towards equality as required by law. The house in Dar es Salaam was significantly more valuable than the hut and shamba in Tanga. The proper approach is to divide the house by rooms, allocating three rooms to the appellant and four to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19870805 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Zainabu Abdalla; Respondent: Omari Abdallah
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 5 August 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Division of Matrimonial Assets, Divorce
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zainabu Abdalla
Appellant
Omari Abdallah
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the division of matrimonial assets by the lower courts was proper and in accordance with the law
Ratio Decidendi
The division of matrimonial assets by the lower courts did not incline towards equality as required by law. The house in Dar es Salaam was significantly more valuable than the hut and shamba in Tanga. The proper approach is to divide the house by rooms, allocating three rooms to the appellant and four to the respondent, with the remainder of the property to be sold and proceeds divided equally, or for the parties to agree on division of other property under court supervision.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The house in Dar es Salaam to be divided by rooms: three rooms to the appellant, four rooms to the respondent.
- The remainder of the property to be sold and proceeds divided equally between the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment