20190916 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The plaintiff's allocation of Plot No. 430 Block C, Tegeta in 1986 was unprocedural and based on an unapproved T.P drawing, which did not confer legal title. The 1995 approved survey plan relocated Plot 430 Block C to a different area, now an open space, extinguishing the plaintiff's rights over the disputed land. The first defendant, having a deemed right of occupancy since 1982, was lawfully allocated plots 505 and 506 after the 2010 survey. The allocation by the Commissioner for Lands was lawful, and the plaintiff has no right to the disputed plots.
- Citation
- 20190916 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Zebra International Enterprises Limited; 1st Defendant: Anthony Mrisho Ngai; 2nd Defendant: Commissioner for Lands; 3rd Defendant: The Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Suit dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Land Allocation, Double Allocation, Customary Right of Occupancy, Survey Plans, Letters of Offer, Eviction, Permanent Injunction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zebra International Enterprises Limited
Plaintiff
Anthony Mrisho Ngai
1st Defendant
Commissioner for Lands
2nd Defendant
The Attorney General
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the lawful owner of Plot No. 430 Block C, Tegeta area with the letter of Offer No. LD 12539/6/1 PJAC issued on 25/09/1986
- 2 Whether the disputed plot was surveyed by 1985
- 3 Whether the disputed Plot No. 430 Block C, Tegeta is a different area from Blocks 505 and 506 Block C, Tegeta
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's allocation of Plot No. 430 Block C, Tegeta in 1986 was unprocedural and based on an unapproved T.P drawing, which did not confer legal title. The 1995 approved survey plan relocated Plot 430 Block C to a different area, now an open space, extinguishing the plaintiff's rights over the disputed land. The first defendant, having a deemed right of occupancy since 1982, was lawfully allocated plots 505 and 506 after the 2010 survey. The allocation by the Commissioner for Lands was lawful, and the plaintiff has no right to the disputed plots.
Court Disposition
Suit dismissed with costs
Orders
- Plaintiff's claims for declaration of ownership, eviction, damages, and injunction are dismissed
- Plaintiff to bear costs of the suit
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment