zephrine bitengeko vs burns and blane t ltd 1995 tzhc 727 1 december 1995
The court held that under sections 74 and 75 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966, no appeal lies against an order setting aside an ex-parte judgment; therefore, the appeal is incompetent and not properly before the High Court.
- Citation
- zephrine bitengeko vs burns and blane t ltd 1995 tzhc 727 1 december 1995
- Parties
- Applicant: Zephrin Bitengeko; Respondent: Burns and Blane (T) Ltd.
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Appealability of Order Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Appealability of Orders, Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Employment Disputes
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zephrin Bitengeko
Applicant
Burns and Blane (T) Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Appealability of Order Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal lies against an order setting aside an ex-parte judgment and directing hearing on merits
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that under sections 74 and 75 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966, no appeal lies against an order setting aside an ex-parte judgment; therefore, the appeal is incompetent and not properly before the High Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- No appeal lies against the order setting aside ex-parte judgment; matter to proceed in trial court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment