[2000] UGHC 7

[2000] UGHC 7

The court held that the application was fundamentally defective because it was not accompanied by an affidavit as required by Order 34 rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Instead, the applicant's counsel attached a document titled 'Affirmation' to the originating summons, which does not satisfy the legal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] UGHC 7
Parties
Plaintiff: Abdu Kikomeko; Defendant: Aisa Nalweyiso; Defendant: Aliziki Kalibatanya
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Misc. Appl. No. 1274 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Originating Summons
Outcome
application struck out
Legal Topics
Originating Summons, Vesting Order, Transfer of Land, Estate Succession
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Originating Summons Vesting Order Transfer of Land Estate Succession

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdu Kikomeko

Plaintiff

Aisa Nalweyiso

Defendant

Aliziki Kalibatanya

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Originating Summons

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff after having paid the full purchase price to Muhamad Kasakya, the then beneficial owner of part of the estate of Abudalah Sekimwanyi, is entitled to the transfer of the land in his names.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants as successors to Muhamad Kasakya's estate have any beneficial interest in the land already sold to the plaintiff.
  3. 3 Whether the said Defendants are entitled to any additional purchase price before the transfer of the said land into the Applicant's names.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the application was fundamentally defective because it was not accompanied by an affidavit as required by Order 34 rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Instead, the applicant's counsel attached a document titled 'Affirmation' to the originating summons, which does not satisfy the legal requirement for an affidavit. The affidavit is the bedrock of such an application, and its absence is a fatal defect that cannot be cured. Consequently, the application was struck out for non-compliance with the mandatory procedural requirements.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application is struck out for want of a supporting affidavit.