[1988] ACHPR 2

[1988] ACHPR 2

The African Commission determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the communication because Ethiopia was not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights at the time of the complaint. The Commission's mandate is limited to States that have ratified the Charter, and procedural rules require...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1988] ACHPR 2
Parties
Applicant: Getachew Abebe; Respondent: Ethiopia
Court
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Communication 10 of 1988
Procedural Posture
Communication / Decision
Outcome
communication declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Communications, Jurisdiction of Commission, State Party Requirement
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Admissibility of Communications Jurisdiction of Commission State Party Requirement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Getachew Abebe

Applicant

Ethiopia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Decision

  1. 1 Whether the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights has jurisdiction to hear a communication against a State not party to the African Charter.
  2. 2 Whether the communication is admissible under Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure.

Ratio Decidendi

The African Commission determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the communication because Ethiopia was not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights at the time of the complaint. The Commission's mandate is limited to States that have ratified the Charter, and procedural rules require that communications be directed only against such States. As a result, the communication was declared inadmissible under Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure.

Court Disposition

communication declared inadmissible

Orders

  • The communication is declared inadmissible under Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure.