[1999] UGHC 12

[1999] UGHC 12

The court found that the plaintiff had established a business reputation under the name 'Abercombie & Kent' and was entitled to restrain others from injuring its business by using that name or any semblance likely to deceive or cause confusion. The evidence showed the plaintiff had built goodwill in Uganda and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1999] UGHC 12
Parties
Plaintiff: Abercombie & Kent Ltd; Defendant: Abercombie & Kent (Uganda) Ltd; Defendant: Registrar of Companies
Court
High Court of Uganda
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Civil Suit No. 1035 of 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff; counter-claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Passing Off, Company Name Disputes, Business Reputation, Trade Libel
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Intellectual Property Passing Off Company Name Disputes Business Reputation Trade Libel

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abercombie & Kent Ltd

Plaintiff

Abercombie & Kent (Uganda) Ltd

Defendant

Registrar of Companies

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff was carrying on business in Uganda in 1991 to the knowledge of the first defendant or its agents.
  2. 2 Whether there was any passing off, trade libel, or fraud by either the first or third defendant.
  3. 3 If so, whether the plaintiff is entitled to the remedies claimed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had established a business reputation under the name 'Abercombie & Kent' and was entitled to restrain others from injuring its business by using that name or any semblance likely to deceive or cause confusion. The evidence showed the plaintiff had built goodwill in Uganda and internationally, while the first defendant had not carried on any business or acquired goodwill in the disputed name. The court held that the defendants' use of the similar name constituted passing off and was likely to mislead the public. The plaintiff was entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using the name or any similar name, and to costs of the...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff; counter-claim dismissed

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the first, second, and third defendants from carrying on business under any name constituted of the words 'Abercombie & Kent' or any semblance thereto as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion.
  • Plaintiff awarded costs of the suit.