[2018] EACJ 84

[2018] EACJ 84

The Court found that Japheth Kiziba, who purported to act as agent for the Applicants, was improperly before the Court and lacked locus standi. As a result, he could not make any application, including for adjournment. The application was therefore disallowed, and no order as to costs was made. The ruling reinforces...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] EACJ 84
Parties
Applicant: Rashid Salum Adiy & 39,999 Others; Respondent: The Attorney General of the Revolutionary Republic of Zanzibar; Respondent: The Chief Secretary of the Revolutionary Republic of Zanzibar; Respondent: The Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania
Court
East African Court of Justice
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Number
Application 7 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Adjournment
Outcome
application disallowed
Judges
Jundu JA, Mugenyi JA, Nyawello JA
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Adjournment Applications, Court Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Locus Standi Adjournment Applications Court Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rashid Salum Adiy & 39,999 Others

Applicant

The Attorney General of the Revolutionary Republic of Zanzibar

Respondent

The Chief Secretary of the Revolutionary Republic of Zanzibar

Respondent

The Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Adjournment

  1. 1 Whether Japheth Kiziba had locus standi to act as agent for the Applicants in this application.
  2. 2 Whether the application for adjournment was properly before the Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that Japheth Kiziba, who purported to act as agent for the Applicants, was improperly before the Court and lacked locus standi. As a result, he could not make any application, including for adjournment. The application was therefore disallowed, and no order as to costs was made. The ruling reinforces the requirement that only properly appointed representatives or parties with standing may move the Court.

Court Disposition

application disallowed

Orders

  • The application is disallowed.
  • No order as to costs.